https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64605
Ilya Verbin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Verbin ---
(In reply to vries from comment #8)
> (In reply to Ilya Verbin from comment #5)
> > (In reply to vries from comment #4)
> > > But I think the main difference is that the offload table and main (using
> > > the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Verbin ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> But I think the main difference is that the offload table and main (using
> the offload table) are now in the same partition. I don't know whether
> that's by design or acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Verbin ---
I tried to reproduce this issue using trunk gcc and OpenMP:
gcc -fopenmp -flto -flto-partition=balanced -lgfortran -save-temps
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/target2.f90
But all functions are privatized, e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Verbin ---
It seems that support of offload sections in Mach-O will require substantial
changes to gcc/config/darwin.c, like it was done for LTO.
I'm going to disable the generation of any offload sections when a compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
Ilya Verbin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #15 from Ilya Verbin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14)
> Thanks for the commit. Any plan to take into account the Jakub's remarks in
> comment 11?
Yes, I added them to my TODO list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Verbin ---
So, I'll implement strchrnul in libiberty, ok?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
Ilya Verbin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62107
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Verbin ---
Great! Now all fortran tests pass with separate memory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62107
Ilya Verbin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Verbin ---
Yes, this fixes the issue. Thank you.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: iverbin at gmail dot com
To reproduce using trunk gcc:
g++ -fopenmp libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/target-2.C
testsuite/libgomp.c++/target-2-aux.cc
GIMPLE after ompexp phase
13 matches
Mail list logo