--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=21858)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858&action=view) [edit]
It fixes the bug with no regressions for r164480.
Thanks!
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:30 ---
.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 ---
Subject: Bug 45051
Author: hp
Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010
New Revision: 164498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164498
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/41085
Backport from
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 ---
Subject: Bug 41085
Author: hp
Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010
New Revision: 164498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164498
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/41085
Backport from
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=21858)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858&action=view)
Same patch, just gunzipped this time. :)
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=21857)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21857&action=view)
Same patch, just s/0/NULL_RTX/ in two places.
As mentioned plus one more place.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:11 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=21855)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21855&action=view) [edit]
> Patch that fixes the problem
>
> cse was losing track of cc0
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 01:57 ---
I hacked around a similar suboptimality using -fno-tree-reassoc.
(...looking...)
See PR37916 (oops! still assigned to me; the easy route I envisioned became a
dead end).
Adding a preprocessed version of huffdec.c (use
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 14:37 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> -O3 -g
I forgot to mention, also: -fno-delayed-branch (reorg is always the usual
suspect when latent bugs are exposed, but not so this time.)
I guess it's fair to include Ale
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=21784)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21784&action=view)
shortened gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90
-O3 -g
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unkno
--- Comment #14 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 01:07 ---
committed <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00932.html>
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #13 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 00:53 ---
Subject: Bug 41087
Author: hp
Date: Mon Sep 13 00:52:48 2010
New Revision: 164241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164241
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/41087
*
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 00:49 ---
Subject: Bug 41087
Author: hp
Date: Mon Sep 13 00:49:27 2010
New Revision: 164240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164240
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/41087
*
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-11 04:56 ---
Corrected component re: analysis.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-11 04:33 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This regression disappeared in the range (162414:162421], perhaps because of
> r162418. Let's see if it remains hidden, or if this PR just shapeshifted into
> PR45051.
I (finally
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 03:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=21760)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21760&action=view)
Patch, take 2.
Need to gate the side_effects_p call: tmp != NULL_RTX && side_effects_p (tmp).
--
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 08:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=21748)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21748&action=view)
patch
The simplest solution is to correct noce_get_condition to not follow its
documentation and no
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 04:11 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> And last but not
> least, decorate the new insn(s) with REG_INC notes as appropriate, as regmove
> (the next pass) seems to expect them: note that insn 1223 doesn't have one.
Se
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 04:08 ---
Bother, I should have spotted the general area of this bug faster. It's a
matter of ifcvt.c calling
emit_insn_before_setloc (seq, if_info->jump,
INSN_LOCATOR (if_info
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 02:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=21731)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21731&action=view)
Somewhat simplified test-case
I'm having a look at this.
I simplified the test-case somewhat, elim
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 13:28 ---
Subject: Bug 45505
Author: hp
Date: Tue Sep 7 13:23:24 2010
New Revision: 163949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163949
Log:
PR fortran/45505
* gfortran.dg/pr25923.f9
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 07:11 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> xfail the test-case for ilp32 targets with a reference to this PR.
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-09/msg00179.html>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 22:02 ---
I think I'll try doing it the IIUC documented preferred way for deferred bugs;
to xfail the test-case for ilp32 targets with a reference to this PR. And yes,
seen by the cris-elf autotester too.
--
hp at gcc do
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 21:48 ---
Fixed by r163917, apparently.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 16:08 ---
Correct title, possibly component, milestone.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
decimal64-1.c gcc.dg/nodfp-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 02:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=21707)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21707&action=view)
Simplified gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c
See the combine dump at e.g. -O2. I haven't
6-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45545
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 15:15 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00394.html
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 15:04 ---
Subject: Bug 45545
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 5 15:04:20 2010
New Revision: 163878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163878
Log:
PR testsuite/45545
* gfortran.dg/array_memc
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 45266
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45545
--- Comment #15 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 03:08 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Good job picking up on that.
>
> There must be a better way of telling the compiler to generate lwr and lwl
> MIPS
> instructions without breaking strict aliasing rules...?
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 03:16 ---
Unassigning myself as I haven't done and won't do anything besides observing.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 03:14 ---
This regression disappeared in the range (162414:162421], perhaps because of
r162418. Let's see if it remains hidden, or if this PR just shapeshifted into
PR45051.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 03:02 ---
--- good:r162417/abs-2.sSat Jul 24 03:13:36 2010
+++ bad:r162418/abs-2.s Sat Jul 24 03:15:53 2010
@@ -9,27 +9,27 @@ _main_test:
move $srp,[$sp]
subu.b 84,$sp
movem $r8,[$sp
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 02:51 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Oops; replace:
> containing 0x for the low-part of 9223372036854775807LL ((1<<63)-1),
with:
> containing 0x7fff for the high-part of 9223372036854775807LL ((1<<63
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 02:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=21295)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21295&action=view)
Shortened gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c
Compile with e.g. -O2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
k subwords of DImode allocnos"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 02:43 ---
Confirmed fixed, r162392 tested, no regressions compared to r162328.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 15:54 ---
Correcting the summary to point at the right cause. Maybe the following
somewhat obvious change is correct, though I'd prefer to leave it to Bernd.
Index: postrel
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 23:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> postreload.c ICE would be more probably related to r162342 than to r162336.
Right, let's see what Bernd has to say. With the information in the PR, the
solution is likely trivia
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 21:56 ---
The backtrace in #2 was for r162355.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45009
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 21:46 ---
(gdb) r -fpreprocessed -march=v32 -O2 libgcc2.i
Starting program: /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed
-march=v32 -O2 libgcc2.i
__muldc3
Analyzing compilation unit
Performing interprocedural
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 21:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=21270)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21270&action=view)
preprocessed libgcc2.i
Compile with cc1 -fpreprocessed -march=v32 -O2 libgcc2.i.
--
http://gcc.
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-*-* and crisv32-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45009
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 23:07 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > the simulator supports cris-axis-linux-gnu too, but you don't want to build
> > for
> > that target, it's a slightly more co
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-08 16:27 ---
Removing target specifier as the test-case fails for native x86_64-linux as
well, with e.g. r161957, so there's reason to believe the miscompilation is
generic.
Just mentioned in case there's a target-base
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 16:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The addition by 10 appears during postreload, where we substitute
> ...
> which by itself doesn't look wrong.
That's right, if the two stores had been to different locati
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 04:06 ---
cris-elf too, same range (161866:161871].
I really wish committers would test on 32-bit platforms too, or whatever now is
the systematic failure introducing these obvious and easily observable
regressions. :(
--
hp
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=21119)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21119&action=view)
test-case suggested for gcc.c-torture/execute
Compile at e.g. -O2, observe code in PR description, also o
atus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux
GCC target triplet: cris-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44852
--- Comment #23 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-03 03:43 ---
This is fixed, isn't it? No longer fails, c:a r161653 dudging from
gcc-testresu...@.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39959
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 07:45 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Linux/ia32, I also see:
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/erase/1.cc execution test
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/erase/24061-map.cc execution test
> FAIL: 2
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 04:58 ---
FWIW, I didn't see this with r158717 (late April), so I think I'll just close
this PR. No, I don't think it's the same issue as PR44505; after all, these are
two wildly different architectures for w
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 01:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Dupe of PR44505?
Unknown, please hold.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 02:20 ---
Disappeared for cris-elf in (160828:r160836], which agrees i686-linux results
on gcc100 at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-06/msg01649.html>
(160820) and <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresult
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
e to lhd_pass_through_t
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 20:07 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too!
>
> Forgot to mention that it last worked for cris-elf with r160547.
Last known appearance r160
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 21:02 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too!
Forgot to mention that it last worked for cris-elf with r160547.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 21:00 ---
Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too!
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 11:13 ---
Subject: Bug 44460
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jun 10 11:12:12 2010
New Revision: 160533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160533
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/44460
* em
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 11:13 ---
Committed.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 11:11 ---
*** Bug 44453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 11:11 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44460 ***
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 17:53 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The following http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00692.html
> It definitly avoids the ICE, but it would be nice to know if libstdc++
> testsuite passes.
When applied to r1
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 12:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=20866)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20866&action=view)
preprocessed
cc1plus -fpreprocessed eh_alloc.ii -melf -quiet -dumpbase eh_alloc.cc
-auxbase-strip eh_alloc.o
o: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44467
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 20:32 ---
Apparently the test-case has changed, so "fixed"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44356
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 03:21 ---
Fixed after 159920 but before or including 159930. At closer inspection, it
has to be r159929. :) On the other hand, from the patch message it seems it's
just intended to be a stop-gap measure, so I'll leave
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 01:15 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> One thing you could help with is whether there's a way of enabling threads on
> the simulator
You mean "for cris-axis-elf"; no, there is no support for threads on
cri
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 00:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Sorry I wasn't here to answer the basic simulator-target questions, but it
seems you found the information needed to get you going.
> 1/ Did the same commit improve PR44137 on your tar
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 23:53 ---
*** Bug 44289 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 23:53 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44287 ***
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44289
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 18:41 ---
See also PR44137.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44276
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-li
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 00:19 ---
Yes. Thanks.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 03:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=20716)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20716&action=view)
Shortened libgcc2.i
Compile with "./cc1 -fpreprocessed l.i -march=v10 -O2 -o libgcc2.s", observe
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-l
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 07:02 ---
Fixed, see also <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01456.html>.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:53 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:53:34 2010
New Revision: 159618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159618
Log:
PR target/44202
* config/cris/cris.md (&quo
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:52 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:52:25 2010
New Revision: 159617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159617
Log:
PR target/44202
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr4
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:51 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:51:05 2010
New Revision: 159616
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159616
Log:
PR target/44202
* config/cris/cris.md (&quo
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:50 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:50:15 2010
New Revision: 159615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159615
Log:
PR target/44202
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr4
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:48 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:48:37 2010
New Revision: 159614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159614
Log:
PR target/44202
* config/cris/cris.md (&quo
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:47 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:47:41 2010
New Revision: 159613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159613
Log:
PR target/44202
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr4
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:46 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:45:38 2010
New Revision: 159612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159612
Log:
PR target/44202
* config/cris/cris.md (&quo
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:45 ---
Subject: Bug 44202
Author: hp
Date: Thu May 20 06:44:45 2010
New Revision: 159611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159611
Log:
PR target/44202
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr4
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 19:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=20704)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20704&action=view)
test-case
Compile with -O2 -march=v32. Observe "addo 513,$r10,$acr" and "addo
512,$r10,$acr
compare-insn *would* be
redundant and there is none).
--
Summary: Missing compare after add
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: hp at
riority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44137
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 21:33 ---
The committed patch fixed the build issue (thanks), so closing.
If some of the issues in the follow-up comments remains, please clone.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 17:17 ---
Changing back target milestone to reflect the earliest release known to have
the fix.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
