[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #21 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-20 21:23:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Ah, the crypto++ comments were just hijacking an unrelated bug for which no > details have been provided. Please don't do this. Well, the sympto

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #17 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-20 10:09:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > Confirmed. Works with -O0, fails with -O[12] at least. Still fails on the > 4.6 branch. > > Compiling salsa.cpp with -O1 is enough to trigger t

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #14 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-20 07:09:53 UTC --- Created attachment 24796 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24796 full testcase source with required files from Crypto++ 5.6.1 and build command the (slight

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #13 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-20 06:07:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 24794 [details] > the preprocessed source of Salsa20 from Crypto++, with gcc 4.6.0, option -O2 I just discovered that the bug

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #12 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-19 16:14:29 UTC --- Created attachment 24794 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24794 the preprocessed source of Salsa20 from Crypto++, with gcc 4.6.0, option -O2

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #11 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-19 16:12:14 UTC --- Created attachment 24793 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24793 the preprocessed source of salsa20 from Crypto++ with gcc 4.5.1, option -O2

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #9 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-18 19:59:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created attachment 24790 [details] > test case with Salsa20 in Crypto++ Sorry about my partial comment. Used the test case on source of gcc 4.6.1 +

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #8 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques 2011-07-18 19:55:29 UTC --- Created attachment 24790 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24790 test case with Salsa20 in Crypto++

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 Sébastien Kunz-Jacques changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grokbrsm at free dot fr

[Bug preprocessor/31763] New: cc1plus fails to find some headers when include paths are duplicated

rmal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: grokbrsm at free dot fr GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31763