Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: godmar at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 57718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57718&action=edit
using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105051
--- Comment #4 from Godmar Back ---
Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. IMO, the detection doesn't need to be
perfect in the sense of not having false negatives. All 3 bug reports of the
calloc implementations you broke called malloc + mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105051
--- Comment #2 from Godmar Back ---
Thank you for your reply.
To make sure I understand, the only work-around is to completely disable all
builtins (as in -fno-builtin), or is using `-fno-builtin-memset` as I proposed
sufficient?
I'm not sur
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: godmar at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc 8.5.0 (and later) just broke our 18-year-old calloc implementation, which
goes like this:
void *
calloc
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: godmar at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
A student shared this program with me:
#include
#include
void test() {
static _Atomic int x = 0;
printf("%d\n", x += 1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555
--- Comment #11 from Godmar Back ---
I have attached a test case where capture of multidimensional VLA results in
internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9908
I do not know if this is a duplicate of this bug or a separate bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555
Godmar Back changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||godmar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
