--- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2010-04-08 19:26
---
Closing as requested.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2009-07-28 15:09
---
Fixed with above commit.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ct: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40888
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gnu_andrew at member dot fsf
|dot org
and zlib
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
http://gcc
java.io.PrintStream missing
constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andr
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2009-02-13 17:45
---
Created an attachment (id=17294)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17294&action=view)
Preliminary patch, has issues with the returned string reading from the wrong
memory l
copy of java.lang.String
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2009-02-05 23:09
---
Committed to GNU Classpath for 0.98.
CVSROOT:/sources/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Andrew John Hughes 09/02/05 22:54:11
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2009-01-07 02:37
---
This is fixed in the latest merge with libgcj-snapshot-20090102.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2009-01-02 11:30
---
This is external code maintained here:
http://g.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ty: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37791
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-09-26 19:32
---
I doubt it. I don't see libintl being linked against either gcj, gij or gjar
here, and the fault is in Java code (although locale related).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37636
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-09-25 03:20
---
Interestingly:
$ /home/andrew/build/gcj/bin/gcj --version
gcj (GCC) 4.4.0 20080913 (experimental) [gcj/classpath-098-merge-branch
revision 140651]
$ /home/andrew/build/gcj/bin/gjar --version
jar (GNU
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-09-25 01:47
---
I'm not sure when 4.3 branched, but David Daney's locale patch (switching from
gcj's locales to Classpath's) might have had an effect (2008-03-04). It's the
only locale change I can
--- Comment #13 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-08-28 15:40
---
Closing as fixed.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-08-24 23:28
---
Futureproofing:
CVSROOT:/sources/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Andrew John Hughes 08/08/21 20:46:20
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
m4
--- Comment #11 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-08-21 01:02
---
I've added a check to Classpath CVS for 0.7.9 and this should make GCJ 4.4.
Do we need this backporting to anywhere else or is this sufficient to close
this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #10 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-08-21 01:01
---
CVSROOT:/sources/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Andrew John Hughes 08/08/21 00:44:56
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
m4 : acinclude.m4
Log
--- Comment #9 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-08-16 23:14
---
Fix for 0.98; check gjdoc version in configure.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-06-20 14:34
---
Wha is this bug waiting on? The only clear bug I can see here is that the
Classpath build system (not gcc's; Classpath ./configure is invoked by the
surrounding gcj build) should be checking the versi
--- Comment #39 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:10
---
All appropriate changes made. Closing this bug.
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #38 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:08
---
Created an attachment (id=15611)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15611&action=view)
Change tools to use StringBuilder
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #37 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:08
---
Created an attachment (id=15609)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15609&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #36 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:07
---
Created an attachment (id=15608)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15608&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #35 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:07
---
Created an attachment (id=15607)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15607&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #34 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:04
---
Created an attachment (id=15606)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15606&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #33 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:04
---
Created an attachment (id=15605)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15605&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #32 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:03
---
Created an attachment (id=15604)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15604&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #31 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:02
---
Created an attachment (id=15603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15603&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #30 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:02
---
Created an attachment (id=15602)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15602&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #29 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 18:01
---
Created an attachment (id=15601)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15601&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #27 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:58
---
Created an attachment (id=15600)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15600&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #26 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:58
---
Created an attachment (id=15599)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15599&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #25 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:57
---
Created an attachment (id=15598)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15598&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #24 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:57
---
Created an attachment (id=15597)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15597&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #23 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:56
---
Created an attachment (id=15596)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15596&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #22 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:56
---
Created an attachment (id=15595)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15595&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #21 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:55
---
Created an attachment (id=15594)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15594&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #20 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-07 17:54
---
Created an attachment (id=15593)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15593&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #19 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-01 00:45
---
Created an attachment (id=15556)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15556&action=view)
Use StringBuilder in the examples
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #18 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-01 00:44
---
Created an attachment (id=1)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #17 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-05-01 00:44
---
Created an attachment (id=15554)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15554&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #16 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-04-27 22:01
---
Created an attachment (id=15539)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15539&action=view)
Fix substring bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-04-16 23:34
---
I recall there was a CP one that was fixed, but can't seem to find it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35950
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-04-16 22:21
---
The difference is noticeable just from the zip output. This is the working
tools.zip created by fastjar:
0 04-16-08 03:08 gnu/classpath/tools/tnameserv/
2391 04-16-08 03:08 gnu/classpath
_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35950
--- Comment #15 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-17 01:30
---
Created an attachment (id=15336)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15336&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #14 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-17 00:37
---
Created an attachment (id=15335)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15335&action=view)
Abstract reflection elements of CPStringBuilder to a VM class
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #13 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-16 23:37
---
Created an attachment (id=15334)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15334&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #12 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-16 22:45
---
Created an attachment (id=15333)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15333&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #11 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-16 22:29
---
Created an attachment (id=15332)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15332&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.98
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #10 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-05 21:04
---
Created an attachment (id=15266)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15266&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #9 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-05 21:03
---
Created an attachment (id=15265)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15265&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #8 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-05 21:03
---
Created an attachment (id=15264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15264&action=view)
Move towards a CPStringBuilder-using code base
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #7 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-03-01 09:14
---
Created an attachment (id=15250)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15250&action=view)
Patch to add CPStringBuilder
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-27 23:00
---
The new structure is committed. As StringBuilder is final, we will have to
clone AbstractStringBuilder in the gnu.classpath package. This is not too
problematic, as we don't expect the internal cla
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20630
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 22:11
---
I guess an appropriate testcase would be the Eclipse Visual Editor. Is this
known to work with GNU Classpath?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16729
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 19:44
---
No feedback on this bug from the Gtk+ developers still...
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 19:42
---
Is this still valid? GdkPixbufDecoder still lives, but GdkGraphics seems to
have gone.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20630
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 18:51
---
This is still present. CACAO + Classpath CVS HEAD gives:
java.lang.ThreadGroup[name=main,maxpri=10]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
java.lang.ThreadGroup[name=kfm-thread-group-1,maxpri=10]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 18:39
---
Same holds as in Mark's comment for current CVS + CACAO. Capturing works fine
when the frame is onscreen, but any part of the frame that is offscreen is not
captured. When the Offscreen flag is ticked
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 18:27
---
Awaiting changes in Gtk+
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 18:18
---
This does not hang on either current CVS HEAD with cacao or jamvm, or on gij
(version 4.3.0 20080213). Can we close this bug?
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gnu_andrew at member dot fsf
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 15:57
---
Waiting on my patch to abstract StringBuffer/Builder being committed.
Then this is simply a matter of adding a class which uses the 'dont_copy'
version of the String constructor with toString.
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2007-10-09 18:42
---
Is this still a valid thing to do? We have an associated JikesRVM task for it:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/RVM-266
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2007-10-09 18:40
---
Current Classpath has:
FileBasedFactory.java GConfBasedFactory.java MemoryBasedFactory.java
so 3 times the number of factories as when this bug was written. Can we close
it or are we still not
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22162
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21747
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |pre-0.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21649
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21635
--- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-24 20:16
---
Does your compiled version of java.lang.Class contain a field class$0? This is
what me and Tom narrowed the problem down to.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28458
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-22 22:02
---
(gdb) call debug_tree(cons)
unit size
align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1
fields
public static unsigned DI file java/lang/Class.java line 0
size
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-22 21:56
---
constant invariant 128>
unit size constant invariant 16>
align 64 symtab 369628368 alias set -1
fields
unit size
align 64 symtab 369629040 alias set -1
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-22 21:40
---
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x840454 "in %s, at %s:%d")
at
/home/gandalf/projects/java/classpath/gcj/sources/gcj-eclipse-jmx/gcc/diagnostic.c:582
#1 0x004c018c in fancy_abort (file=,
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-22 21:34
---
Created an attachment (id=11922)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11922&action=view)
Class file being compiled
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28458
ity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:45
---
This assertion fails:
gcc_assert (!uid_region_num[INSN_UID (r->label)]);
in gcc/except.c (remove_unreachable_regions)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:40
---
Created an attachment (id=11802)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11802&action=view)
Assembler file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:39
---
Created an attachment (id=11801)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11801&action=view)
Assembler file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:39
---
Created an attachment (id=11800)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11800&action=view)
Assembler file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:38
---
Failed command is:
/home/gandalf/projects/java/classpath/gcj/build/gcc/gcj
-B/home/gandalf/projects/java/classpath/gcj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava/
-B/home/gandalf/projects/java/classpath/gcj
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2006-07-02 17:37
---
Created an attachment (id=11799)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11799&action=view)
Output of the failed command
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16005
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16741
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26707
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24632
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27111
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22163
--- Additional Comments From gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
2005-04-16 15:47 ---
I'm attaching a patch which I've just committed to GNU Classpath CVS.
This fixes this problem, using java.net.URI for interpretation as suggested.
All methods also now follow a common schem
--- Additional Comments From gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
2005-01-22 03:29 ---
In current Classpath CVS head, parsing of this string is now successful. The
output of the given test case is:
$ java TestParse
Result: Wed Jun 04 03:09:35 2003
Fail
"Fail" is printed b
--- Additional Comments From gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
2005-01-20 19:37 ---
This testcase fails on gcj (up to 3.4 at least), GNU Classpath CVS HEAD and
Sun's JDK. Reading the specification for java.util.ResourceBundle suggests that
this is the correct behaviour
98 matches
Mail list logo
