[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

2005-02-24 Thread gniccolai at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From gniccolai at yahoo dot com 2005-02-24 16:04 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Sorry, the correct citation is: "multithreading is defined by an application design that ALLOWS FOR concurrent or simultaneous execution" The rest is cited

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

2005-02-24 Thread gniccolai at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From gniccolai at yahoo dot com 2005-02-24 11:00 --- (In reply to comment #18) > I think this is a waste really for this bug to be open as non of the GCC people commented on it and > when the orginal bug was filed, there was a huge opportunity to talk ove

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

2005-02-22 Thread gniccolai at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From gniccolai at yahoo dot com 2005-02-22 10:27 --- > > You say a hypothetical multithreaded C++ should state this as the semantics > for > static locals, and I don't disagree with you, provided we are not talking > about > one based

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

2005-02-20 Thread gniccolai at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From gniccolai at yahoo dot com 2005-02-20 23:36 --- This comment is relevant regarding the C++ ABI closure on which this idea has been derived: http://groups.google.it/groups?q=g:thl3050439784d&dq=&hl=it&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozi