[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #20 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Any updates on this?

[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #19 from Giuliano Belinassi --- > A formal patch had been sent out as URL field shows, still waiting for review. I am using this patch on libpulp (userspace livepatching) and I found no issues so far. I think this is safe to be com

[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #12 from Giuliano Belinassi --- With your patch we have: > .LPFE0: > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop > nop >

[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #9 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Hello, Kewen. (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8) > Hi @Michael, @Martin, could you help to confirm/clarify what triggers you to > be interested in this feature, is it for some user space usage or

[Bug target/105649] Wrong .localentry address on powerpc64le with -fpatchable-function-entry=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649 --- Comment #2 from Giuliano Belinassi --- This issue is related to PR98125.

[Bug target/105648] .cfi_startproc in wrong position when -fpatchable-function-entry= is enabled on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648 --- Comment #3 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Not sure if duplicate, but it certainly is related to PR99888 and PR98125.

[Bug target/105649] New: Wrong .localentry address on powerpc64le with -fpatchable-function-entry=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649 Bug ID: 105649 Summary: Wrong .localentry address on powerpc64le with -fpatchable-function-entry=1 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug middle-end/105648] New: .cfi_startproc in wrong position when -fpatchable-function-entry= is enabled on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648 Bug ID: 105648 Summary: .cfi_startproc in wrong position when -fpatchable-function-entry= is enabled on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105647] New test g++.dg/modules/pr105169 from r13-566-g7a3f38a966a528 fails with assembler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647 --- Comment #1 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Confirmed. powerpc64le-suse-linux-gcc-11 -fpatchable-function-entry=1 -O2 -c -o /tmp/a.o pr105169_a.C /tmp/ccjfumfv.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccjfumfv.s:64: Error: .localentry expression for `_Z8fun

[Bug tree-optimization/105437] New: ICE on GIMPLE pass slp when vectorizer is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105437 Bug ID: 105437 Summary: ICE on GIMPLE pass slp when vectorizer is enabled Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/105169] New: Compiling C++ code with -fpatchable-function-entry=16,14 results in references to discarded sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105169 Bug ID: 105169 Summary: Compiling C++ code with -fpatchable-function-entry=16,14 results in references to discarded sections Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1