[Bug c++/110596] New: Documentation: typo in the docs for -Wnrvo

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- >From the manual (currently, <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html>, but I'm afraid this is a moving target): -Wnrvo

[Bug c++/110595] New: Documentation: typo in the docs for -Wmissing-include-dirs

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- >From the manual (<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.1.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html>): -Wmissing-include-d

[Bug other/110253] New: The documentation for -ftrapv seems to have an incomplete list of operations

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The documentation (<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.1.0/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html>) for `-

[Bug c++/93769] Slightly wrong diagnostic message for static_asserts with no message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93769 --- Comment #2 from Gennaro Prota --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > (In reply to Gennaro Prota from comment #0) [...] > -std=c++20 implies -std=c++17. I don't think viewing it this way is in general correct. > I suppose we

[Bug c++/93769] New: Slightly wrong error message for static_asserts with no message

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Compiling with -std=c++14 --pedantic, the following translation unit: static_assert(true);   int   main

[Bug c++/91179] New: Spurious -Wconversion warning after promotion

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, this a reduced test case for: <https://github.com/gennaroprota/breath/commit/14dcd189a67fc48f6f275c7569610911fe8adae9>. It is similar to bug

[Bug c++/90640] New: -Wpointer-arith appears to be enabled by default, but is not reported by --help

: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following program: # 1 "pointer_arith_by_default.cpp" # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1

[Bug c++/90592] Documentation: Missing word (or wrong parenthesization) in "Function Names as Strings"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90592 --- Comment #1 from Gennaro Prota --- In "Function Names as Strings" (par. 6.50 in ) there's the following text: As an extension, at file (or, in C++, namespace scope), __func__ evalua

[Bug c++/90592] New: Documentation: Missing word (or wrong parenthesization) in "Function Names as Strings"

NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In "Function Names as Strings" (par. 6.50 in <https://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug c++/90468] New: Documentation: typo in the part that tells whether the positive or the negative form of an option is documented

: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- From the manual: Each of these specific warning

[Bug c++/90467] New: Documentation: many warning options that are enabled by default are documented in the -Woption form, not -Wno-option

: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- From the manual (emphasis mine): Each of

[Bug c++/90466] New: Documentation: -Wconversion-extra not documented

Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The option -Wconversion-extra, appearing in the output of g++ -Q --help=warnings | fgrep conversion is not documented. Is this intentional?

[Bug c++/90465] New: Documentation: one of the meanings of -Q not described

Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- From the manual: -Q Makes the compiler print out each function name as it is compiled, and print some statistics about each pass when it

[Bug c++/90464] New: Documentation: incorrect description of -Wunused

Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The documentation for the -Wunused option says: "All the above -Wunused options combined". (1) This would include -Wunused-const-variable, w

[Bug c++/90463] New: Documentation: -Wunused not listed among the options enabled by -Wall

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gennaro.prota+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The documentation for the -Wunused option says "note that -Wall implies -Wunused" however the list