https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110045
--- Comment #7 from Frank J. T. Wojcik ---
After playing with this a bit more, I was able to find a Generator which
produces a slightly wider bound, but still nowhere near 0x1.fep+127.
This also includes the requested change to SimpleGen.
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110045
--- Comment #6 from Frank J. T. Wojcik ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> 2 things, I think your result_type in SimpleGen needs to be public.
Sure, I'll change that.
> Second is LLVM's libc++ outputs:
> -inf -inf
> inf inf
I on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110045
--- Comment #4 from Frank J. T. Wojcik ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> With 24bit precision, maybe it is ~8 standard deviations away from the mean.
> But the generator argument can change for each call though so that does not
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110045
--- Comment #2 from Frank J. T. Wojcik ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The heavy weight goes to potentially. The way I understand it is not the max
> of what operator() has produced currently but will potentially return in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110045
Bug ID: 110045
Summary: std::normal_distribution (and likely others)
give wrong min() and max() values
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
