https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118265
--- Comment #5 from Adam Ryan ---
Hi Andrew, is that the test case you want to go into the patch? I had thought
since that the test case would be better with parameter pack containing
function references as the current one only compiles from c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78216
--- Comment #6 from Adam Ryan ---
After investigating this further I have found that the issue I encountered had
a different root cause and I've created a new PR for it here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118265.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118265
--- Comment #1 from Adam Ryan ---
Created attachment 60026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60026&action=edit
Patch that has been submitted for review.
I've submitted a patch for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118265
Bug ID: 118265
Summary: Failure in resolving non-type template parameters with
nested parameter pack of form
...B>
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78216
--- Comment #5 from Adam Ryan ---
I should the patch only allows the code snippet I posted to compile, the code
from the original poster has a different exception however I think the eventual
solution may be common to both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78216
--- Comment #4 from Adam Ryan ---
Created attachment 59981
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59981&action=edit
An example code change that will allow the code to compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78216
Adam Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc.gnu.org@ajryansolutions
