https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119294
Bug ID: 119294
Summary: Strange (buggy?) codegen when passing cleared vector
as argument
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
--- Comment #16 from Niklas Haas ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #15)
> (In reply to Niklas Haas from comment #12)
> > Out of curiosity, is there a work-around that I could use to get current
> > versions of GCC to compile the ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
--- Comment #12 from Niklas Haas ---
Out of curiosity, is there a work-around that I could use to get current
versions of GCC to compile the right thing, but without breaking cross-platform
compatibility?
I did try replacing the assertion by "x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
--- Comment #1 from Niklas Haas ---
Clang's output for comparison:
lshift:
vmovdqu ymm0, ymmword ptr [rdi]
vmovd xmm1, esi
vpsllw ymm0, ymm0, xmm1
vmovdqu ymmword ptr [rdi], ymm0
vzeroupper
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
Bug ID: 119103
Summary: Very suboptimal AVX2 code generation of simple shift
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103738
--- Comment #2 from Niklas Haas ---
Created attachment 52010
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52010&action=edit
No deprecation warning produced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103738
Niklas Haas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52009|no_warning.c|warning.c
filename|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103738
Bug ID: 103738
Summary: No warning when setting deprecated fields using
designated initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm