https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99810
--- Comment #5 from gcc at cookiesoft dot de ---
Alright. Then again, sorry for the noise. I was hunting down a bug and thought
I found it with this one... so I have to search further.
Thank you everyone!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99810
--- Comment #3 from gcc at cookiesoft dot de ---
I actually haven't, but yes, you're right that it will print out the correct
value.
I'm somewhat sorry for the noise.
Is there a reason, e.g. performance, that the .word is "wrong"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99810
Bug ID: 99810
Summary: Wrong const evaluation of 64-bit division
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
--- Comment #2 from gcc at cookiesoft dot de ---
it's not my code, but a MCVE ;)
I'm using
[tomlplusplus](https://github.com/marzer/tomlplusplus/blob/master/toml.hpp) and
there the constructor is marked as nodiscard.
I may file an issue there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Bug ID: 99362
Summary: invalid unused result
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
