https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324
--- Comment #3 from gcc-v850-bugs at engineer dot com ---
Thanks for the response! I just managed to build gcc 4.9.2 (using binutils
2.25) and the issue is still present, which is obvious with your input. I will
look in the binutils direction ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324
--- Comment #1 from gcc-v850-bugs at engineer dot com ---
The complete error messages (omitted -mv850es since "Error: unrecognized option
-mv850es", included it erroneously above due to "This is an alias for the
-mv850e1 option."). Also, v850 doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324
Bug ID: 104324
Summary: v850-elf-as regression: displacement is too large
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone