https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56568
--- Comment #4 from fuzzyTew at gmail dot com ---
I'm not as experienced in the details. I think perhaps my example is invalid
as you state but the original testcase is not (see &&).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56568
--- Comment #3 from fuzzyTew at gmail dot com ---
The definition of initializer_list is that the array backing it contains copies
of the listed values and has the same lifetime as the list itself.
If the return value is bound into the object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56568
fuzzyTew at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fuzzyTew at gmail dot com
