http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917
--- Comment #3 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-10 09:54:28 UTC ---
Ok, I didn't know about the defect report and resolution yet.
I must admit that I quite like the syntax.
I added a remark about the defect and a short example to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917
Bug #: 52917
Summary: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be
compiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902
Bug #: 52902
Summary: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849
--- Comment #1 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-03 18:25:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 27078
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27078
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849
Bug #: 52849
Summary: crash when using suscript operator in delctype
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S