[Bug libstdc++/52917] [DR 2048] explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

2012-04-10 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 --- Comment #3 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-10 09:54:28 UTC --- Ok, I didn't know about the defect report and resolution yet. I must admit that I quite like the syntax. I added a remark about the defect and a short example to

[Bug libstdc++/52917] New: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

2012-04-09 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 Bug #: 52917 Summary: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52902] New: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

2012-04-07 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Bug #: 52902 Summary: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52849] crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument

2012-04-03 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849 --- Comment #1 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-03 18:25:46 UTC --- Created attachment 27078 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27078 testcase

[Bug c++/52849] New: crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument

2012-04-03 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849 Bug #: 52849 Summary: crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED S