--- Comment #7 from filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com 2007-02-26
13:01 ---
> is wrong, it should be instead:
> mov #1, r1
OK!
This is what I get if I use __builtin_nanf() instead of nanf.
But using nanf there isn't any undefined nanf symbol in the obiect
generated,
--- Comment #5 from filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com 2007-02-26
09:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=13112)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13112&action=view)
assembler code of nanf-test.c
Following a piece of the objdump of the nanf-test:
:
:
int
mai
--- Comment #3 from filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com 2007-02-26
08:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=13111)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13111&action=view)
prerprocessed file of nanf-test.c
In attach you can find the preprocessed file nanf-test.i
--- Comment #1 from filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com 2007-02-23
15:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=13100)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13100&action=view)
simple test case exploiting gcc bug
compiled with the following command:
> sh4-linu
By: filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sh4-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30936
