[Bug c/117809] feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117809 --- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de --- Another real-world example is asprintf from GNU libc: int asprintf(char **restrict strp, const char *restrict fmt, ...);

[Bug rust/119353] [15 regression] Rust fails to build (build failure: error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353 --- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de --- I ran rustup update stable. $ rustc --version rustc 1.85.0 (4d91de4e4 2025-02-17)

[Bug rust/119353] New: build failure: error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353 Bug ID: 119353 Summary: build failure: error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/117810] Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 --- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de --- Hmm, now that you mention it explicitly... Just like C++ iterators, max does not actually point at the last element in the array but at the first element behind the array. That appears to be more

[Bug c/117810] New: Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 Bug ID: 117810 Summary: Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/117809] New: feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117809 Bug ID: 117809 Summary: feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug analyzer/117807] New: analyzer gets confused by integer promotion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117807 Bug ID: 117807 Summary: analyzer gets confused by integer promotion Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: anal

[Bug driver/114658] branch "releases/gcc-13" builds "gcc version 14.0.1 (experimental)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114658 felix-gcc at fefe dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug driver/114658] branch "releases/gcc-13" builds "gcc version 14.0.1 (experimental)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114658 --- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de --- I'm probably doing something really stupid wrong, sorry for the noise. Here's what I'm doing: $ git checkout releases/gcc-13 Switched to branch 'releases/gcc-13' $ git branch master * releases/

[Bug driver/114658] New: branch "releases/gcc-13" builds "gcc version 14.0.1 (experimental)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114658 Bug ID: 114658 Summary: branch "releases/gcc-13" builds "gcc version 14.0.1 (experimental)" Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/107614] build goes through but make install fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107614 felix-gcc at fefe dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug other/107614] New: build goes through but make install fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107614 Bug ID: 107614 Summary: build goes through but make install fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug ipa/105728] dead store to static var not optimized out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105728 --- Comment #4 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de --- If you do have a printf that references debug_cnt, it wouldn't be removed, right? If you expect unreferenced variables to not be optimized out, you can always compile without optimizer. For local

[Bug c/105728] New: dead store to static var not optimized out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105728 Bug ID: 105728 Summary: dead store to static var not optimized out Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug analyzer/100294] New: need attribute takes_ownership

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100294 Bug ID: 100294 Summary: need attribute takes_ownership Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug c/98460] New: _builtin_cpu_supports("sha") missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98460 Bug ID: 98460 Summary: _builtin_cpu_supports("sha") missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c