https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #6 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
I don't think hobbyist Sega Genesis devs are willing to hire gcc a hacker to
solve the issue.
My bet is no one in the world with money is using m68k.
Why not drop m68k altogether
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #4 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Bump. Any news? gcc 4.9.1 doesn't look good either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #10 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
The patch seems to be working; but it doesn't seem to be accepted. Why not?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #8 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Persists in gcc 4.8.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #3 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Persists in gcc 4.8.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111
fdarkangel at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdarkangel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #1 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com 2012-04-07 08:36:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 27110
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27110
C code demonstrating the problem + assembly output of gcc3 and gcc4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
Bug #: 52897
Summary: gcc 4.7.0 generates worse code than gcc 3.4.6 for
m68000
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52896
Bug #: 52896
Summary: internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:447
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
Bug #: 52773
Summary: internal error: in replace_pseudos_in, at
reload1.c:577
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
10 matches
Mail list logo