http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #22 from David Fang ---
Do one of these apple libunwind sources (0.30, 0.35.1) correspond to what's
bundled in libgcc_s in darwin8,9,10?
http://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/libunwind/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #14 from David Fang 2012-11-19
21:40:44 UTC ---
Would this be needed for darwin8 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
--- Comment #2 from David Fang 2012-03-23
19:58:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26969
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26969
preprocessed source
generated by:
/Volumes/Isolde/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc
-sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52690
Bug #: 52690
Summary: ICE after bootstrap comparison in libjava
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
--- Comment #25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #5 from David Fang 2012-03-12
02:28:49 UTC ---
Reran using entire set of odcctools-20090808 (passed through configure), looks
like same failures:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #15 from David Fang 2012-03-12
02:26:40 UTC ---
I see this test failing on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (32b G4, ppc7400):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html
Is this specific to 64b, or should it also work for 32b pp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #4 from David Fang 2012-03-09
20:44:14 UTC ---
Also, from my testing, it looks like AS=odas is needed; if I just pass
AS_FOR_TARGET=odas, then the wrong assembler is used and sjlj.S fails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #3 from David Fang 2012-03-08
16:03:46 UTC ---
This build finished, using odcctools' as, but there are some test failures with
libitm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00893.html
How can I get the failure details for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #2 from David Fang 2012-03-05
21:02:27 UTC ---
I tried overriding as to point to odcctools-20090808's version:
% odas -v
Apple Inc version odcctools-698.1od9, GNU assembler version 1.38
and that worked better.
% /Volumes/Isolde/f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #1 from David Fang 2012-03-04
18:45:58 UTC ---
powerpc/sjlj.S contains:
#include "asmcfi.h"
#if defined(__powerpc64__) && defined(__ELF__)
...
#elif defined(__ELF__)
...
#elif defined(_CALL_DARWIN)
.macro FUNC name
.globl _
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
Bug #: 52482
Summary: libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23081
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
--- Comment #23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #10 from David Fang 2011-07-10
04:44:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Using Iain's patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24655 ), a
> native powerpc-darwin8 bootstrap has just completed successfully.
> The testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #16 from David Fang 2011-07-10
04:41:14 UTC ---
This current patch yields excellent results on powerpc-darwin8 now:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-07/msg01092.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #9 from David Fang 2011-07-05
22:34:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I tested the patch on darwin 8 on a G5 and with crosses from darwin 9 - >
> darwin 8.
Using Iain's patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24655
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #7 from David Fang 2011-07-01
18:13:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 24655 [details]
> make sure that the size of the dyld_stub_binding_helper is adjusted for arch.
>
> please try this -
> - it resolves the p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
David Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
Summary: bootstrap failure in libffi:darwin_closure for
powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #29 from David Fang 2011-06-29
20:21:52 UTC ---
re-ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #15 from David Fang 2011-06-29
18:02:48 UTC ---
This bug can probably be closed. --with-dwarf2 has been working for quite a
while.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg02820.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
--- Comment #1 from David Fang 2011-06-29
17:57:34 UTC ---
My 32b-only powerpc arch is a G4, which really should have multilib disabled
for most components. I couldn't find an option to
--disable-libquadmath-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
Summary: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #17 from David Fang 2011-05-20
17:56:25 UTC ---
I usually catch these with -Wshadow -Werror.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #27 from David Fang 2011-03-28
23:42:54 UTC ---
Friendly ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #26 from David Fang 2011-02-22
00:16:19 UTC ---
Friendly ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #11 from David Fang 2011-02-07
21:02:13 UTC ---
Any updates on this? re-confirmation? I would like to continue testing
gcc-4.5.x on powerpc-darwin8, but can't b/c of this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #24 from David Fang 2011-01-13
23:23:49 UTC ---
Apologies, my typo:
known-to-fail: 4.4.4 4.5.2
known-to-work: 4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #23 from David Fang 2011-01-13
22:07:10 UTC ---
Hi again, any chance Dodji's patches could be pushed to the 4.5 and/or 4.4
branches, before it gets too close to release time again? Thanks.
also if we're keeping fields accurate,
keyw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #22 from David Fang 2010-11-30
21:11:02 UTC ---
Little ping: is this still expected to be fixed in 4.4.x and 4.5.x?
Not that it should matter, but it's still a rejects-valid showstopper for
compiling my project, which other users kee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #20 from David Fang 2010-11-02
17:50:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Fantastic explanation, thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #10 from David Fang 2010-11-01
20:40:17 UTC ---
Thanks for working on this, Dodji!
Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example until
this is patched and the next release is out. Can you think of any?
Ju
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Summary: g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32523
--- Comment #9 from David Fang 2010-09-29
21:36:02 UTC ---
Out of curiosity, any benchmark updates on more recent releases?
41 matches
Mail list logo
