--- Comment #4 from evgeny at mainsoft dot com 2009-11-22 09:45 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This is by design for C++03 but for C++0x (really C++1x) it is not.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41792 ***
>
Thank you Andrew. I'll follow the bug 41
--- Comment #2 from evgeny at mainsoft dot com 2009-11-19 08:12 ---
The source code published in bug description compiled successfully with gcc
(g++) 3.4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42105
--- Comment #1 from evgeny at mainsoft dot com 2009-11-19 08:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=19044)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19044&action=view)
preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42105
4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/ext/new_allocator.h:103:
note: candidates are: void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::construct(_Tp*, const
_Tp&) [with _Tp = test]
--
--
Summary: class with operator& failed to be stored in the S
