https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #9 from Evgeniya Maenkova ---
I use 32bit Linux, perhaps, that gives the difference.
Regarding checking and O2 - I will read about this. Thanks for your note.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #7 from Evgeniya Maenkova ---
I got only 317Mb by top.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #5 from Evgeniya Maenkova ---
Also, I collect massif data and see no tree-ssa-lim in it (i mean in top
contributors).
So what do you think?
(How did you measured 1,8Gb caused by lim? - this is for me to understand
whether this bug i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #4 from Evgeniya Maenkova ---
My gcc version for now: gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20140908 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #3 from Evgeniya Maenkova ---
Could you please clarify your comment #36
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590#c36) in PR4596? I mean "LIM
is now the pass that pushes
memory usage to 1.8GB - all other optimization passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
Evgeniya Maenkova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evgeniya.maenkova at gmail dot
com
