https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #32 from Erhard F. ---
The patchset
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/zpioop6il_igm...@cowardly-lion.the-meissners.org/
does no longer apply on gcc-15.0.1_pre20250413.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #30 from Erhard F. ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #29)
> csfore, erhard, could you test
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/zpioop6il_igm...@cowardly-lion.the-
> meissners.org/?
The patches apply cleanly on Gentoos' g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #27 from Erhard F. ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #25)
> I think this is the solution we want, meaning if the target we're building
> supports VSX, then we'll build the IEEE128 bits, otherwise, we won't build
> them. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #17 from Erhard F. ---
Sidenote: Interestingly GCC 14 builds fine with -mcpu=970 -mtune=970 despite
the PowerPC G5 (aka. 970, POWER4+) is before ISA 2.06 and not being able to use
-mvsx either.
I used Gentoo snapshot gcc-14.0.1_pre2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #3 from Erhard F. ---
(In reply to Christopher Fore from comment #0)
> Created attachment 57251 [details]
> original preprocessed file
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Attempt to build GCC 14 (latest snapshot attempted is Gentoo's 20240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96786
Erhard F. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erhard_f at mailbox dot org
--- Comment #2 f
