--- Comment #6 from emilp at mac dot com 2006-03-08 16:47 ---
I'm considering filing a defect report (for a standard clarification) to the
commitee but I would like to make sure I'm not climbing any trees here... In
your first reply you said "My understanding is that
--- Comment #4 from emilp at mac dot com 2006-03-08 15:23 ---
I did come on a bit strong, didn't I? Sorry about that, I'm just a bit
frustrated since it used to work better in the gcc 3 series :-)
Do you have a suggestion as to where I could continue this discussion?
--- Comment #2 from emilp at mac dot com 2006-03-08 08:45 ---
But isn't this problem already solved for the "using" directive. The code below
compiles fine and works as expected. In fact, in the days of gcc 3, "using"
could be used for namespaces and behave
necessary namespace-alias ambiguity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: emilp at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26448
