http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #19 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-16
02:21:07 UTC ---
Fair point, noted. I believe ideas are not copyrightable, though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #16 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-15
12:30:55 UTC ---
Makes sense. I was hoping to avoid copyright assignment by having someone else
do the work :) Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
Eugene Toder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27395|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #11 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-15
02:03:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 27407
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27407
Another simple test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #5 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-14 05:05:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 27396
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27396
Another approach
Actually, a much simpler and cleaner change might be along these lines.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #4 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-14 04:41:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 27395
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27395
POC for mainline
Never mind, I was looking in tr1 instead of bits.
Yes, it's a bit more tricky in ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #3 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-14 02:40:03
UTC ---
Can you point me to where libstdc++ mainline lives these days? trunk and a
couple other branches I've checked don't have that line in hashtable_policy.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #1 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-13 22:22:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 27394
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27394
Quick and dirty proof-of-concept patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
Bug #: 53339
Summary: unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete
type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
