--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-03 19:28
---
I never seem to get time to do anything about this bug, so I'll better unassign
it from me.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 18:51
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Created an attachment (id=13618)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13618&action=view) [edit]
> > decl.c patch (not
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 15:41
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=13618)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13618&action=view) [edit]
> decl.c patch (not check-gfortran tested)
>
> Erik, ar
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 22:28
---
I thought I would have time to do something about this bug, but I will not; not
in the next few weeks/months. I therefore unassign it from me. My appologies
to those who expected to be fixed soon.
If it's
RMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:20
---
fixed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:19
---
fixed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:19
---
Subject: Bug 29630
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:19:01 2006
New Revision: 118599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118599
Log:
2006-11-08 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:19
---
Subject: Bug 29679
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:19:01 2006
New Revision: 118599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118599
Log:
2006-11-08 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:14
---
Subject: Bug 29679
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:14:06 2006
New Revision: 118598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118598
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-08 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 21:14
---
Subject: Bug 29630
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:14:06 2006
New Revision: 118598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118598
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-08 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:19
---
Subject: Bug 29679
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Nov 6 22:18:54 2006
New Revision: 118528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118528
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-06 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:19
---
Subject: Bug 29630
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Nov 6 22:18:54 2006
New Revision: 118528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118528
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-06 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-03 23:20
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
ssignedTo: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 29630
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29679
iority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29630
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 20:45
---
Subject: Bug 29393
Author: eedelman
Date: Tue Oct 24 20:45:29 2006
New Revision: 118011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118011
Log:
fortran/
2006-10-24 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 20:40
---
Subject: Bug 29393
Author: eedelman
Date: Tue Oct 24 20:40:19 2006
New Revision: 118010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118010
Log:
fortran/
2006-10-24 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 17:01
---
Subject: Bug 29393
Author: eedelman
Date: Tue Oct 24 17:01:30 2006
New Revision: 118008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118008
Log:
fortran/
2006-10-24 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #19 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:38
---
Created an attachment (id=12106)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12106&action=view)
Updated patch
Fixes the conflicts with recently committed patches.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 16:24
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Eric, can this bug be closed as FIXED now?
>
Yes, I would say so.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 21:31
---
Subject: Bug 25217
Author: eedelman
Date: Sat Aug 19 21:31:47 2006
New Revision: 116262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116262
Log:
fortran/
2006-08-20 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 21:06
---
Subject: Bug 25217
Author: eedelman
Date: Sat Aug 19 21:05:59 2006
New Revision: 116261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116261
Log:
fortran/
2006-08-19 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 19:50
---
Fixed on 4.2. (No need to fix it on 4.1, since allocatable dummies aren't
supported there.)
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #17 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:23
---
Created an attachment (id=12060)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12060&action=view)
New version.
Yup, the previous patch wasn't complete (it lacked
libgfortran/intrinsics/move_al
--- Comment #15 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 21:55
---
Created an attachment (id=12049)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12049&action=view)
Updated patch
Fix the problem reported by Jack.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-30 21:38
---
Created an attachment (id=11975)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11975&action=view)
Latest version
Fixed a bunch of problems, added some documentation, and moved MOVE_ALLOC to a
file
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 20:16
---
Subject: Bug 28416
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Jul 24 20:15:59 2006
New Revision: 115721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115721
Log:
fortran/
2006-07-24 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 18:45
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The fix, as described on the list, is to be found in the latest patch to
> PR20541 - the TR15581 story. It includes the corrections to the
> going-out-of-scope cleanup, as wel
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 18:05
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Bug number PR27360
>
> A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
> The mailing list url for the patch is
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2
illed
--
Summary: Memory leaks when reading logicals
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedB
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 12:52
---
Works on mainline (will become 4.2). Will (probably) not be backported to 4.1.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 19:24
---
Subject: Bug 16136
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Mar 5 19:24:48 2006
New Revision: 111741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111741
Log:
fortran/
2005-03-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 22:31
---
A few binary search steps later: Works with revision 111270, fails with 111271.
It seems to be related to the patch
2006-02-19 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* resolve.c (resolve_contained_fun
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 14:11
---
For me, on Linux/x86, it works with revision 111200, but ICEs with 111300 and
111387.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 20:06
---
Subject: Bug 26201
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Feb 20 20:06:49 2006
New Revision: 111311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111311
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-20 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 18:50
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > With this fix, trunk is now once again able to compile VASP. Too bad it
> > seems
> > to be a bit late to get into 4.1. Maybe 4.1.1
--- Comment #9 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 17:23
---
Subject: Bug 26201
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Feb 19 17:23:07 2006
New Revision: 111270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111270
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-19 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 19:52
---
Here's a small one-liner patch that I think fixes the bug. I'll post it to the
mailing list later tonight if/when it passes regression testing.
Index: gcc/fortran/i
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 14:12
---
With Philippe's testcase, I can reproduce the problem on my system now.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 21:20
---
I can't reproduce the problem with MUMPS on Linux/x86 (mainline revision
11, 4.1 revision 110989). Assuming that Steve used a 64 bit processor, it
seems that for this code the bug is visible only on 6
--- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 20:31
---
Fixed on 4.1 and mainline.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 17:34
---
Subject: Bug 25806
Author: eedelman
Date: Tue Feb 14 17:34:07 2006
New Revision: 110989
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110989
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-14 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-12 17:34
---
Subject: Bug 25806
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Feb 12 17:34:15 2006
New Revision: 110893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110893
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-12 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 19:12
---
Possibly related to the patch for PR 25716 (committed to mainline 2005-01-25).
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 21:51
---
A slightly improved form of the patch attached here earlier has been posted to
the mailing list for review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00394.html
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 20:52
---
Created an attachment (id=10777)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10777&action=view)
Patch to fix the bug.
We also get into trouble if we try to pass the result of a pointer-to-array
re
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 17:11
---
If I compile the original testcase with current mainline (revision 110561), the
binary dies on execution with
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0xbfc9d020 ***
Aborted
If I remove the line
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 11:29
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> How about this?
As far as I can see, this latter testcase is valid code. Confirmed.
An additional comment:
If I change the call to the generic subroutine bar_ in xxx to a call
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 21:19
---
Fixed on mainline and 4.1
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 20:45
---
Subject: Bug 24266
Author: eedelman
Date: Tue Jan 31 20:45:40 2006
New Revision: 110447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110447
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-31 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 11:12
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The original code looks like
>
>subroutine foo(self)
> character(*) :: self
> pointer :: self
> nullify(self)
> allocate(self)
>
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 22:24
---
Subject: Bug 24266
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Jan 30 22:23:57 2006
New Revision: 110412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110412
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #18 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 17:19
---
Subject: Bug 25716
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Jan 27 17:19:36 2006
New Revision: 110302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110302
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-27 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #17 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 25716
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Jan 25 20:46:29 2006
New Revision: 110225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110225
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-25 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 23:22
---
Created an attachment (id=10645)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10645&action=view)
Improved patch
After some more testing, I found out that the previous patch still failed in
som
--- Comment #11 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:40
---
Created an attachment (id=10640)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10640&action=view)
Improved patch
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #10 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:38
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > Attached a patch that fixes the problem on x86 and a cross-compiler to
> > sparc64. I intend to contemplate it a bit further before I post it to the
> > list f
--- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 00:12
---
Created an attachment (id=10639)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10639&action=view)
Patch to fix the bug.
Attached a patch that fixes the problem on x86 and a cross-compiler to spar
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 12:32
---
According to the mail http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-01/msg00123.html, it
fails on x86-64 and SPARC64 too. I don't see the error on Linux/x86.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 00:03
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The limit was rose but we should be able to do better.
Indeed. But the problem is not trivial. For a case like above, where the
array is a variable, we can translate it to
(prog
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 16:21
---
Fixed on 4.1 and mainline.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 16:19
---
Subject: Bug 25093
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Jan 9 16:19:22 2006
New Revision: 109500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109500
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-09 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 17:53
---
Subject: Bug 25093
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Jan 8 17:52:57 2006
New Revision: 109474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109474
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-08 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 00:14
---
Working on a patch.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25693
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 21:17
---
Fixed on 4.1 and mainline,
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 21:10
---
Subject: Bug 23675
Author: eedelman
Date: Thu Jan 5 21:10:05 2006
New Revision: 109389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109389
Log:
fortran/
2006-01-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 00:22
---
Subject: Bug 23675
Author: eedelman
Date: Thu Jan 5 00:22:39 2006
New Revision: 109368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109368
Log:
2006-01-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 20:41
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00079.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 19:27
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this really a bug, changing the subroutine to:
> subroutine bar()
> character(len=10) :: str
> write (str, *) 0
> end subroutine bar
>
at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25628
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 22:44
---
The testcase compiles without error messages in 4.2.0 20051230 (I haven't tried
with 4.1 or 4.0 yet). However, if I try to use IntToChar2 from another program
unit, I get another error, so there's s
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:16
---
Now it should be fixed for all cases. Re-closing.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:11
---
Subject: Bug 25396
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:11:15 2005
New Revision: 109173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109173
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:11
---
Subject: Bug 22607
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:11:15 2005
New Revision: 109173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109173
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:07
---
Subject: Bug 22607
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:07:48 2005
New Revision: 109172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109172
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:07
---
Subject: Bug 25396
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:07:48 2005
New Revision: 109172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109172
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:02
---
Subject: Bug 22607
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:02:44 2005
New Revision: 109171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109171
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:02
---
Subject: Bug 25396
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 30 15:02:44 2005
New Revision: 109171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109171
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-30 Erik Edelmann <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 22:35
---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-12/msg00511.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22607
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 20:57
---
I think this simple one-liner fixes the bug:
Index: interface.c
===
--- interface.c (revision 109139)
+++ interface.c (working copy)
@@ -1718,6
--- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 20:52
---
It seems my patch fixed pure by-reference functions only for internal
functions. Pure by-ref. module functions still doesn't work:
erik:/home/gcc/head/test$ cat pure_byref_3.f90
module huj_mod
contains
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 20:01
---
Working on a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25396
--- Comment #10 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 22:09
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Fixed on 4.1. Not yet fixed on 4.0, because it depends on PR 15326 which
> hasn't been fixed for 4.0.
PR 15326 will not be fixed for 4.0, I presume, so neither will t
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 21:53
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Never mind. I managed to reduce it to something that doesn't depend on any
> modules.
The reduced testcase is here:
SUBROUTINE MATIERE()
REAL :: XSNAK(2)
XS
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 21:31
---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> It seems to me that the .mod-file is corrupted. Could you send the source
> code
> of the module too, instead of just the .mod file?
>
Never mind. I managed
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 19:41
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=10467)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10467&action=view) [edit]
> m_mb_control.mod
>
> Fortran module needed by matie
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 19:26
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 21:20
---
Here's a reduced testcase:
module ModelParams
implicit none
type ReionizationParams
real :: fraction
end type ReionizationParams
type CAMBp
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 17:58
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So it seems the problem was introduced within the last 24 hours.
To be a bit more precise: works with revision 108902, ICE:s with revision
108943.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 19:49
---
With GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20051221 it works (I get a lot of 'undefined
reference' messages, but no ICE:s). But with 20051222 I get the same ICE
message that Martin gets. So it seems the p
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 16:17
---
Fixed on trunk, 4.1 and 4.0
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
