--- Comment #36 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2010-06-10 21:28 ---
Alexander, you're omitting to consider that call pushes EIP + 4 onto the stack.
Thus on entry the stack is already misaligned by -4, so gcc is correct.
--
ed at catmur dot co dot uk changed:
--- Comment #7 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-22 00:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=14994)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14994&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message.patch
de-obfuscate the pedwarn code path
--
ed at catmur dot co dot uk
--- Comment #6 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-22 00:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=14993)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14993&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message.patch
Try to handle system-header and inhibit conditions/flags correctly.
--
--- Comment #5 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-20 22:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14981)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14981&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message.patch
--
ed at catmur dot co dot uk changed:
What|
--- Comment #4 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-20 22:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=14980)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14980&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message.patch
Also when preprocessing-only.
--
ed at catmur dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-20 08:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=14977)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14977&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message-cpp-diagnostic.patch
Is this what you meant? Not sure whether I've got the sou
--- Comment #1 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2008-01-06 22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=14892)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14892&action=view)
gcc-cpp-Werror-message.patch
Proposed patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34695
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ed at catmur dot co dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34695
--- Comment #14 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2007-11-14 21:16 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I don't see why this is different from the case where the header file cannot
> be
> opened.
It isn't, I guess - is there a bug about that?
> And in that case, as T
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ed at catmur dot co dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33048
--- Comment #3 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2006-03-28 19:15 ---
OK, so it's tetex that's broken. Sorry for the invalid report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26908
--- Comment #1 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2006-03-28 18:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=11141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11141&action=view)
foo.s
Output of gcc -g3 -S foo.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26908
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ed at catmur dot co dot uk
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26908
--- Comment #11 from ed at catmur dot co dot uk 2005-11-29 23:55 ---
This is not invalid. Yes, reiser4 is broken, but so is gcc.
gcc (3.4.4, I haven't used 4.x yet) dies when it encounters an inaccessible
directory as a subdirectory of a member of the include path. See comm
n very simple code with -O2 -ftracer
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ed at catmur dot co dot uk
15 matches
Mail list logo