https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108345
Bug ID: 108345
Summary: Mismatch __attribute__((aligned(x))) between
declaration and definition does not raise
error/warning
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
--- Comment #18 from Thibaut M. ---
Jonathan, it looks like you have a good idea of what could be the patch, could
you detail it please? :) Or are you referring to the one you already suggested
here https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2016-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
--- Comment #12 from Thibaut M. ---
Thank you for the updated link!
The problem with the original code is that it malloc unconditionally at least
2.4ko on the heap. This cannot be avoided when liking with libstdc++.
This malloc is done very earl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
Thibaut M. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dumoulin.thibaut at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535
Thibaut M. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dumoulin.thibaut at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101981
--- Comment #7 from Thibaut M. ---
There are other regressions (in term of code size) but not sure if this is the
same.
For example, this code:
```C
#include
void big_switch(int a) {
switch (a) {
default:
printf("default a(%d)\n", a);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101981
--- Comment #5 from Thibaut M. ---
Thanks Martin!
Do you think it can be patched?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101981
--- Comment #2 from Thibaut M. ---
I'm not sure to understand your statement.
It looks like the switch lowering is wrong here because it takes now more time
with the new GCC than the previous one. Is looks like a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995
Bug ID: 101995
Summary: regression built-in memset missed-optimization arm -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101981
Bug ID: 101981
Summary: GCC10 produces bigger asm for simple switch than GCC7
- cortexM4
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
10 matches
Mail list logo
