[Bug c++/106974] New: g++ bug caused by r260621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106974 Bug ID: 106974 Summary: g++ bug caused by r260621 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [10 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 --- Comment #10 from Bo Duan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Bo Duan from comment #6) > > Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10? > > It's scheduled for a backport to GCC 11, I'm not aware that GCC 10 is

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [10/11 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 --- Comment #8 from Bo Duan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Bo Duan from comment #6) > > Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10? > > It's scheduled for a backport to GCC 11, I'm not aware that GCC 10 is >

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [11 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 --- Comment #6 from Bo Duan --- Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10?

[Bug tree-optimization/102046] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 with -O3 -march=btver2 since r1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046 --- Comment #13 from Bo Duan --- (In reply to Bo Duan from comment #11)

[Bug tree-optimization/102046] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 with -O3 -march=btver2 since r1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046 --- Comment #12 from Bo Duan --- (In reply to Bo Duan from comment #10) > Created attachment 51697 [details] > 0001-Subject-PATCH-ipa-102714-IPA-SRA-eliding-volatile.patch I'm so sorry, I seem to have sent it in the wrong place.

[Bug tree-optimization/102046] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 with -O3 -march=btver2 since r1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046 --- Comment #11 from Bo Duan --- Hi, should we backport this patch to gcc-10? If needed, an adapted patch is attached.

[Bug tree-optimization/102046] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 with -O3 -march=btver2 since r1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046 Bo Duan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||duan.db at linux dot alibaba.com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [11 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 --- Comment #5 from Bo Duan --- The patch works. Thanks you.

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] New: A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 Bug ID: 102714 Summary: A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone