[Bug fortran/40638] RTE: "Unit number in I/O statement too large" -- fails with any low value

2009-07-04 Thread dtprice at shaw dot ca
--- Comment #16 from dtprice at shaw dot ca 2009-07-04 19:02 --- I just implemented the patch in my copy of 4.4 and recompiled. Works! Many thanks to all of you for your prompt attention. Even though I should not be very surprised, it's really cool that such service is possible i

[Bug fortran/40638] RTE: "Unit number in I/O statement too large" -- fails with any low value

2009-07-03 Thread dtprice at shaw dot ca
--- Comment #5 from dtprice at shaw dot ca 2009-07-03 15:06 --- I stated earlier > Identical code runs fine with same gfortran installed on a system > equipped with an earlier Intel chip Turns out this was wrong. The version on that system is 4.2.0 Interesting that using d

[Bug fortran/40638] RTE: "Unit number in I/O statement too large" -- fails with any low value

2009-07-03 Thread dtprice at shaw dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dtprice at shaw dot ca 2009-07-03 14:54 --- Sorry. In the middle of uploading the attachment I had a power cut! To respond to your queries: Program and input file are now uploaded. Yes it was compiled with gfortran -Wall testfile.f and no further options. I have

[Bug fortran/40638] RTE: "Unit number in I/O statement too large" -- falls with any low value

2009-07-03 Thread dtprice at shaw dot ca
--- Comment #2 from dtprice at shaw dot ca 2009-07-03 14:20 --- Created an attachment (id=18134) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18134&action=view) Contains simple demo program and input file. Input file is not really needed because program never o

[Bug fortran/40638] New: RTE: "Unit number in I/O statement too large" -- falls with any low value

2009-07-03 Thread dtprice at shaw dot ca
Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dtprice at shaw dot ca GCC build triplet: gfortran -Wall testfile.f GCC host triplet: Intel Core I7; SuSE 11; http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40638