[Bug target/53056] bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

2012-04-20 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 --- Comment #2 from D W 2012-04-20 20:20:46 UTC --- Typo: add2 should be: vi16 add2(A a, A b) { vi16* av = &a.v; vi16* bv = &b.v; return *av + *bv; }

[Bug target/53056] bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

2012-04-20 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 --- Comment #1 from D W 2012-04-20 20:16:35 UTC --- Also tested arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.8.0-svn186501. Same results.

[Bug target/53056] New: bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

2012-04-20 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 Bug #: 53056 Summary: bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52951] internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays

2012-04-13 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52951 D W changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52743] g++-4.7.0 seg faults on overload functions.

2012-04-13 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52743 D W changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drwowe at yahoo dot com --- Comment #4 from D W

[Bug c++/52951] internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays

2012-04-13 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52951 --- Comment #3 from D W 2012-04-13 18:22:29 UTC --- After a little more investigation it turns out this was fixed by the fix to bug 52743. So I guess this is actually a dup.

[Bug c++/52951] internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays

2012-04-13 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52951 --- Comment #2 from D W 2012-04-13 16:22:28 UTC --- I built gcc from gcc-4_7-branch, svn186417. I can confirm it does not segfault on my example.

[Bug c++/52966] New: ill-formed template constexpr functions are accepted?

2012-04-12 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52966 Bug #: 52966 Summary: ill-formed template constexpr functions are accepted? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/44811] non controllable bogus warning: right/left shift count is negative

2012-04-12 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44811 D W changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drwowe at yahoo dot com --- Comment #3 from D W

[Bug c++/52951] New: internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays

2012-04-12 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52951 Bug #: 52951 Summary: internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/41492] New: Please ignore #! on the first line of a file

2009-09-28 Thread drwowe at yahoo dot com
own Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: drwowe at yahoo dot com GCC build triplet: All GCC host triplet: All GCC target triplet: All http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41492