https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108051
Leandro Nini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drfiemost at email dot it
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108051
Bug ID: 108051
Summary: Missing array-bounds warning when not using -ftracer
flag
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776
--- Comment #2 from Leandro Nini ---
Oh, now I see it, it wasn't that obvious in the first test. But why is the
compiler allowed to postpone the store after deleting the pointer? Is there
some undefined behavior involved here or what?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776
Bug ID: 106776
Summary: Unexpected use-after-free warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98444
Bug ID: 98444
Summary: [10 Regression] compile error with -ftracer and
-Werror=format-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
URL: https://github.com/elogind/elogind/iss