[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 99936, which changed state. Bug 99936 Summary: [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 Bug 99227 depends on bug 99936, which changed state. Bug 99936 Summary: [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Domin

[Bug fortran/103434] Pointer subobject does not show to correct memory location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103434 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/103045] False report substring out of bounds with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103045 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-02 Status|UN

[Bug libfortran/102992] fortran: redirecting standard out to a file does not work on macOS 12.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbug at duemmels dot de --- Co

[Bug fortran/103043] gfortran can not write to files (macOS Monterey GCC 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103043 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/67542] ICE in gfc_emit_parameter_debug_info, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4947 and :4945

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of pr102685, fixed by r12-4452?

[Bug fortran/99183] [9/10/11 Regression] Incompatible Runtime types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99183 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This seems to have been fixed between r12-4097 and r12-4638. Duplicate of pr102745, fixed by r12-4464?

[Bug fortran/100970] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Domi

[Bug fortran/99183] [9/10/11 Regression] Incompatible Runtime types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99183 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Incompatible Runtime types |[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug fortran/92701] ICE assigning to assumed rank derived type component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92701 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This seems to have been fixed between r11-4933 and r11-6947 and back ported to gcc10.

[Bug fortran/67542] ICE in gfc_emit_parameter_debug_info, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4947 and :4945

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- As for r12-4638 the tests are now rejected whit Error: The shape of component 'c' in the structure constructor at (1) differs from the shape of the declared component for dimension 1 (2/1) So this o

[Bug fortran/102901] ICE (segfault) when compiling pdt_13.f03 with -fcheck=all in gfc_check_pdt_dummy -> structure_alloc_comps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102900] ICE via gfc_class_data_get with alloc_comp_class_4.f03 or proc_ptr_52.f90 using -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/102903] Invalid gfortran.dg testcases or wrong-code with -fcheck=all -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102903 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-23 Status|UN

[Bug fortran/98342] Allocatable component in call to assumed-rank routine causes invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Has this bug been fully fixed now, so that we can close it? It seems so.

[Bug fortran/102862] CLASS(*) – various issues, esp. with assumed-rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102862 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- In both case I get FAIL! chrcmp: 66 != 65281 FAIL! chrcmp: 66 != 65281 FAIL! chrcmp: 67 != 65282 FAIL! chrcmp: 68 != 65283 FAIL! chrcmp: 69 != 65284 FAIL! chrcmp: 70 != 65285 FAIL! chrcmp: 71 != 652

[Bug fortran/102503] ICE in gfc_conv_array_bound, at fortran/trans-types.c:1224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102503 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/102859] [OpenMP] Missing testsuite coverage for Fortran task reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102859 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/102885] New: [12 Regression] ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_char_10.f90 with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102885 Bug ID: 102885 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_char_10.f90 with -flto Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- New failures between r12-4031 and r12-4090: FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) F

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Seems it changed with r12-3129-gf95946afd160e2a1f4beac4ee5e6d5633307f39a The problem is gone if I revert r12-3129.

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] Illegal instruction with large arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > What is your stack size? 65532 kbytes > Does it help if you declare a SAVEd? The illegal instruction is gone.

[Bug fortran/102366] New: [10/11/12 Regression] Illegal instruction with large arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 Bug ID: 102366 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] Illegal instruction with large arrays Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/101283] New: Severaal test fail on Darwin with -gctf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 Bug ID: 101283 Summary: Severaal test fail on Darwin with -gctf Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug fortran/100971] ICE: Bad IO basetype (7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100971 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Domi

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can you provide some more detail on your setup? program p integer, parameter :: a(2) = 1 integer, parameter :: b = a(2)%kind end I get the ICE with a patched master and a genuine GCC11 with

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08 Status|UN

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It seems that Mac OS doesn't have the full set of C11 standard headers... :-( Shouldn't the C11 standard headers be provide by GCC12? Nevertheless the test compiles with the new version of the new

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITI

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > So gnu is indeed faster for real(8), but the result was changed. What OS are you using? In any sensible library REAL(4° should be faster than REAL(8). > notice the result was also changed REAL(4)

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On a MacOS, Corei9, 2.4Ghz, the program runs in ~1s, almost indpendtly of the option level. This PR remind me an old problem in which the transcendental functions were almost slower for REAL(4) then

[Bug fortran/100860] class(*) type is (character(*)) produces a segmentation fault when run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100860 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- WORKSFORME from GCC7 up to trunk.

[Bug fortran/96012] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96012 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70949] Invalid aggregate against pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70949 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > his PR appears to have been fixed between r11-6743 and r11-6879. Confirmed. Could someone be kind enough to add the test to the test suite?

[Bug other/35014] Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libfortran |other --- Comment #12 from Domini

[Bug fortran/88356] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Werror in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1318 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug target/94324] [10/11/12 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |target --- Comment #8 from Domini

[Bug fortran/60576] [9/10/11/12 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I still get ==33027==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffee0fa7e08 at pc 0x00010ef9b521 bp 0x7ffee0fa7a40 sp 0x7ffee0fa71f0 ... with GCC12 and gfc /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/tes

[Bug fortran/96859] Wrong answer with intrinsic merge_bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Sorry I didn't use the right compiler. If I do so, I get * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=EXC_I386_GPFLT) frame #0: 0x000101443613 f951`splay_t

[Bug fortran/34040] Support for DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE != 64 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #17 from Domi

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Using an instrumented compiler I get % gfcg pr87993.f90 ../../work/libiberty/splay-tree.c:496:19: runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x00010001 for type 'struct splay_tree_s',

[Bug fortran/100813] Function of array of pointers to abstract class returning an array since r6-202-gf3b0bb7a560be0f0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I have fixed the glaring mistake in PR94331.c, could you be so gentle > as to test it to verify that it does indeed solve the problems you found? The problem seems solved with the updated PR94331.c

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Domi

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Domi

[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Domi

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Easier to read warnings: pr94331_1.f90:121:10: warning: type of 'checkb_o_ar' does not match original declaration [-Wlto-type-mismatch] 121 | if(.not.checkb_o_ar(a, 0, ex-1))stop 28 |

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Domi

[Bug fortran/100816] Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100819] Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Dom

[Bug fortran/100821] Deferred character with wrong length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100821] Deferred character with wrong length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-29 Status|UN

[Bug middle-end/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If I'm understanding correctly and this is an extension being deprecated, > is there any option to push the compilation with gcc11.1 through? Did you try -std=legcy?

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/100607] ICE with SELECT RANK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100607 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I don't think I have the necessary permissions, but I may be missing > something > obvious... Did you try to click on 'take' in Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone (edit) (take) ? If y

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-24 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||molah at ucar dot edu --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100235] 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100235 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100227] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] write with implicit loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The following variant gives an ICE type t end type contains function f() result(t) character(3) :: c c = 'abc' end end The back trace is * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main

[Bug fortran/99255] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99255 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-18 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100118] ICE on sizeof with derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100103] Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100103 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100098] Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100098 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100097] Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-14 Status|UN

[Bug fortran/100027] ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 See Also|

[Bug fortran/100024] [10/11 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code S

  1   2   3   >