--- Additional Comments From dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
2005-04-27 09:28 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> On second thought, maybe we can safely change the enum to not be anonymous...
I think so, too as I can't see any user error in the second example.
--
--- Additional Comments From dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
2005-04-27 09:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=8750)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8750&action=view)
Use const static member instead of enum
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Additional Comments From dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
2005-04-27 09:07 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The second example seems to me also a duplicate of 19404. This is a reduced
> testcase:
>
> class Foo { };
> template void operator/(const F
--- Additional Comments From dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
2005-04-27 06:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=8748)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8748&action=view)
Another source illustrating the problem.
Error messages:
/data/heizer1_0/strassed/
--- Additional Comments From dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
2005-04-27 06:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=8747)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8747&action=view)
Source file illustrating the faulty behavior
Error messages:
gcc4_template.C: In f
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dominik dot strasser at infineon dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC