--- Comment #14 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-03-02 02:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=10953)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10953&action=view)
4.1.0 branch version of patch.txt.
--
dogcow at babymeat dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #13 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-02-28 06:45 ---
results sent to gcc-testresults; here's the summary of the g++ section of the
tests.
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array15.C execution test
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.o
--- Comment #10 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-02-28 03:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=10933)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10933&action=view)
patch as of -r 111507
With the (attached) patch modified to work with -r 111507, it now compiles,
lin
--- Comment #6 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-02-28 01:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=10931)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10931&action=view)
diff of eh_alloc with old and new gthr-posix.h
This should be pretty obvious, but it elucidates
--- Comment #4 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-02-28 01:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=10930)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10930&action=view)
-g3 -save-temps'ified eh_alloc.cc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489
--- Comment #1 from dogcow at babymeat dot com 2006-02-27 23:55 ---
And, in fact, reverting gthr-posix.h to -r 110280 makes things build
successfully.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489
.h:586:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutexattr_destroy' was not declared in this scope
It looks like this might be attributable to the update from 110280 to 111412 of
gcc/gthr-posix.h.
--
Summary: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
Product: gcc
Versi