[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-15 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #19 from Dimitar Yordanov --- I've rerun related tests and they look OK with the latest patch.

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-13 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #17 from Dimitar Yordanov --- I've executed more tests and see another one failing. This time "begin" is inside of another range, not the one that gets calculated with this "begin". So there is again an overlapping in the btree. Coul

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #12 from Dimitar Yordanov --- > Does this patch fix the problem for you? yes. The failing testcase is successful after the change. I'll schedule more tests.

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #10 from Dimitar Yordanov --- Valid question. Seeing others hitting the same issue and looking at the backtrace I would think it is not directly in our code but comes with the usage LLVMs LLJIT

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #8 from Dimitar Yordanov --- yes

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #6 from Dimitar Yordanov --- Before the fix for PR 110956 there was just one btree_insert call for the same "ob"

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 --- Comment #5 from Dimitar Yordanov --- > It looks like the code does not find an unwind frame when de-registering an > exception handler >From what I understand so far the issue is already there when doing the registration. There is twice a

[Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291

2024-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731 Dimitar Yordanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com ---

[Bug c++/105035] New: regression ICE segmentation fault with -Wduplicated-cond

2022-03-23 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105035 Bug ID: 105035 Summary: regression ICE segmentation fault with -Wduplicated-cond Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/104880] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8231 since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070

2022-03-14 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104880 --- Comment #4 from Dimitar Yordanov --- Thanks, works for me!

[Bug middle-end/104880] New: regression ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8231

2022-03-11 Thread dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104880 Bug ID: 104880 Summary: regression ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8231 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P