https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r13-1213 PASS for me
r13-1164 FAIL for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> And the bug is?
> The S class doesn't have the key method defined, so some other TU needs to
> define it and thus provide the vtable and rtti for it.
> Wit
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r12-7608 FAIL
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-6649 PASS
r12-6793 FAIL
r12-7557 FAIL
$ $ cat y.i
extern void g();
struct a {
} b(int c, int d) {
struct a *e = 0;
int f;
if (c & 1 || !(c & 2))
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90347
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r12-5761 PASS for me
r12-5648 FAIL
r12-5761 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Sounds like gcc-8.0.1 PASS for me
r257061 FAIL
r258034 PASS
r12-5546 PASS
$ ~/arch-gcc/SVN/gcc_258034/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180227 (experimental) [trunk revision 258034]
$ ~/arch-gcc/SV
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-4256 FAST
r12- SLOW
g++ -fpreprocessed -std=c++98 -O2 --param max-jump-thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102797
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r12-4256 PASS
r12- FAIL
$ cat x.ii
struct b {
b(int);
};
void d() {
int c = 1;
do
try {
b a = 1;
while (1) {
c++;
a = 1;
}
} catch (...) {
}
w
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-3456 PASS
r12-3545 FAIL
$ cat x.i
static int GetHashParam_HP_OPAQUEBLOB_pdwDataLen = 0;
void *memcpy(void *, const void *, unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96894
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210210 (experimental) [master revision
bd0e37f68a3:deed5164277:72932511053596091ad291539022b51d9f2ba418]
PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93695
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210104 (experimental) [master revision
7f2b7317566:9da1da01aec:39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a] (GCC)
r11-6442 PASS
gcc version 11.0.0 20210108
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98568
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ ~/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-6442 PASS
r11-6475 FAIL
$ cat x.i
char a[2];
void c()
{
int b;
a[1] = b >> 8;
a[0] = b;
}
// creduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94195
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
us: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-3264 PASS
r11-3279 FAIL
$ configure --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97087
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 49235
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49235&action=edit
unreduced file
preprocessed openssl-1.1.0 crypto/blake2/blake2s.c
compilition aborted after ~1h
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49234
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49234&action=edit
-O3 slowdown 70x
gcc -O3 -c y.i
r11-3192 0.06s
r11-3210 3.45s
r11-3234 3.61s
gcc -O2 -c y.i
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> I see the test-cases fixed.
> Can you still reproduce that?
r11-1553 PASS x_1.i for me and FAIL unreduced one.
r11-1582 PASS x_1.i, x_2.i for me and PASS un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r11-1582 PASS for me x_2.i and original (non-reduced) compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r11-1553 PASS original testcase for me.
And FAIL similar test with the same stack.
$ cat x_2.i
typedef int a[10];
typedef struct {
a b;
a c;
a d;
} e;
e j;
void k() {
int *h = j.c, *f = j.d, *g
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-1451 PASS
r11-1512 FAIL
`gcc -O2' PASS
$ gcc -O3 -c x_1.i
x_1.i: In function 'k':
x_1.i:10:6: error: defini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8)
> Thanks for the reports. This should now hopefully be fixed with r11-522.
r11-526 PASS for me.
Thanks
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-459 PASS
r11-495 FAIL
$ cat x.cpp
struct s { } a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94961
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r11-196 PASS for me.
Thanks.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-46 PASS
r11-117 FAIL
configure --enable-checking=yes,df --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--disable-multilib
make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93894
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
`unsigned' changes nothing
$ cat xxu.i
int f1(int j, unsigned k)
{
switch (j) {
case 0:
switch (k % 2) {
case 0:
return 0;
case 1:
return 1;
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
SVN:r257061 8.0.1 20180125 FAIL
r10-6795 FAIL
$ cat xx.i
int f(int j, int k)
{
switch (j) {
case 0:
switch (k % 2) {
case 0:
return 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93845
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
'-Wall -Wextra -O3' free variant
$ cat x.ii
struct g;
struct h {
g *operator->();
};
class i {
void *a;
int b;
public:
template f j() { return *static_cast(this); }
};
struct k : i {};
struct
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
probably differs from PR93776 and PR93516
r10-6309 PASS
r10-6342 FAIL
r10-6723 FAIL
[r10-6723] g++ -fpreprocessed
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257061 FAIL -- SVN/gcc version 8.0.1 20180125
r10-6659 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
template struct b {
struct c;
b d
} using e = b;
e f;
$ ~/arch-gcc/gcc_current/bin/g++ -fpreprocessed -fchecking
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r10-6309 PASS
r10-6342 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
struct b;
struct c {
b *operator->();
};
class e {
void *f;
int d;
pub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r10-6310 PASS for me both reduced and unreduced cases.
Thanks
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r10-6101 PASS
r10-6221 FAIL
PASS with anonymous namespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 47654
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47654&action=edit
pre-processed isl_fold.c
gcc_r277495
./contrib/download_prerequisites
~/src/gcc_r277485/configure --enabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> @Dmitry: Can you please attach a pre-processed source file (-E option)?
done
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> @Dmitry: Can you please attach a pre-processed source file (-E option)?
@Martin: FAIL start for me during gcc bootstrap somewhere between r277460 and
r27748
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93074
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> According to
> https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-driver-api/group__CUDA__DEVICE.html
>
> cuDeviceGetName exists.
> Maybe F31 has an older version of Cuda i
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r279700 PASS
r279735 FAIL
Fedora 31 x86_64
configure --disable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none
make
[...]
libtool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Original test case from c#0 crash in trunk
gcc version 10.0.0 20191204 (experimental) [trunk revision 278972] (GCC)
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -fsyntax-only a.ii
a.ii:5:1: error: types may not be defined i
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r278936 PASS
r278958 FAIL
Maybe dup PR86905?
$ $ cat x.ii
struct a {
int operator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r278496 fix my original problem.
Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Thank for clarification.
Sorry for noise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
I use system compiler for bootstrap: gcc9/Fedora31
Did I understood you correctly: I need offloading compiler installed after
r277662 if I say '--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none' ?
so invalid PR?
us: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r277655 PASS
r277686 FAIL
sounds like stage 1 issue?
configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r277655 PASS for me: testcase and original case.
Thank You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
very strange
r277625 FAIL for me for testcase from c#1 and for original problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92278
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r277625 PASS for me for testcase from c#0 and for original problem.
Thank you
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r277460 PASS
r277486 FAIL as PR92242
r277504 FAIL
r277576 FAIL
$ cat a.i
typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ cat a.i
typedef unsigned (*c)(void *, void *);
typedef struct {
c d;
} e;
unsigned bar(void *, void *);
unsigned baz(void *, void *);
static const e f[] = {{bar}, {baz}};
const e *foo() {
retu
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r277460 PASS
r277504 FAIL
Fedora 31 x86_64
gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC -flto [40+ files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r277504 PASS for me.
Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Happends during in-tree build of ISL. Did you do the setup with
> ./contrib/download_prerequesites?
Yes, I setup with ./contrib/download_prerequesites
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
correctly reduced testcase
$ cat x.i
unsigned foo(int a) {
if (a)
return 0;
return 1;
}
$ cat y.i
unsigned foo(int);
int bar() {
foo(0);
return 0;
}
$ cat libso.ver
{ global:
bar;
local:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
over reduced but still ICE
$ cat x.i
unsigned foo(int a)
{
if (a)
return 0;
}
$ cat y.i
unsigned foo();
void bar() { foo(); }
$ cat libso.ver
{ global:
bar;
local: *; };
$ gcc -O2 -flto -c x
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r277460 PASS
r277486 FAIL
I'll try creduce it / proprietary codebase, 50+ files LTO l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
simplified configure' call
configure --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib
--with-isl
make
/home/dimhen/build/gcc_current/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dimhen/build/gcc_current/
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r277460 PASS
r277485 FAIL
gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-checking=yes,df,fold,rtl,extra --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--disable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92205
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #14 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, dimhen at gmail dot com wrote:
> I guess
> previously the uninit pass didn't emit warnings for the load
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> Fixed.
r267903 FAIL and r267907 PASS for me with original problem -- LLVM-current
build
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Will be fixed by my patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00782.html
> but the testcase is useful.
dup PR92049?
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r276763 PASS
r276764 FAIL
clang-8 PASS
$ cat x.ii
struct a;
struct b {
static a c();
};
struct a : b {};
template struct d {
void e() { 0
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r258989 PASS
r259099 FAIL
r276845 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
template struct a;
template struct a:
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -c x.ii
x.ii:2:57: error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91976
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r276503 PASS for me
Thank you, Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91976
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
FAIL: configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--disable-multilib
PASS: configure --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--disable-multilib
0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc bootstrap
r276439 PASS
r276476 FAIL
Fedora 30 x86_64
/home/di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
--- Comment #24 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r257061 optimize too
gcc version 8.0.1 20180125 (experimental) [trunk revision 257061] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90872
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
probably start at r267665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91223
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
slightly reduced
$ cat y.i
int a, g;
int *b, *f, *h;
void *memcpy(void *, const void *, unsigned long);
typedef struct {
int b;
} * c;
int d(void);
c e;
int d() {
char c[16];
bd:
for (a = 0; a <=
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r273563 PASS
r273642 FAIL
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc_current
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r272711 PASS
r273474 FAIL
r273563 FAIL
$ ~/arch-gcc/gcc_272711/bin/gcc -Werror=maybe-uninitialized -O2 -c x.c -DFOUR
$ ~/arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Why do you think this is a regression?
> /usr/src/gcc-test/obj/gcc/cc1.9 pr91193.c
> a
>
> pr91193.c:2: error: ‘a’ redeclared as different kind of sym
: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257061 FAIL
r273505 FAIL
$ cat x.i
typedef a
: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc -fpreprocessed -c x.i can
-- report error
-- ICE in linemap_macro_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:1003
-- crash_signal in get_location_from_adhoc_loc libcpp/line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90891
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r267346 PASS
r267961 FAIL
r272203 FAIL
$ cat x.i
a() {
void b() = ;
b == 0
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/gcc -fpreprocessed -c x.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90866
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #5)
> $ cat x.i
> typedef enum { a } b;
> typedef struct {
> int c[0];
> } d;
> typedef struct {
> int *data;
> } e;
> typedef struct {
> e buffer;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90866
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ cat x.i
typedef enum { a } b;
typedef struct {
int c[0];
} d;
typedef struct {
int *data;
} e;
typedef struct {
e buffer;
} f;
int g, h;
int i();
int i(f *j, d *k, b l, int m) {
if (l)
if
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
I see smth may be similar starts at r265648 / PR87041
265647 NO warnings
265648 warnings
270581 warnings
$ cat x.cpp
#include
#include
extern void extf(char*);
extern unsigned U1;
extern unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90191
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> Actually I think the warning is valid. Ramping up the aggressiveness of the
> threader is what ultimately exposes it.
[...]
>
> But AFAICT the warning is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90191
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> So is the warning good or bad? That it now depends on the param suggests a
> change in default optimization behavior.
Sorry not to be clear
Warning with
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r265568 PASS
r265754 FAIL
r270458 FAIL
Warn if compiled with "-O2 --param max-jump-thread-duplication-stm
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r270434 --enable-checking=release not ICE
r270435 --enable-checking=yes,df,fold,rtl,extra ICE
$ cat x_2.ii
template <, typename a, typename typename, typename a,
$ g++ -fpreproces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
PASS
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=yes
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable-multilib --with-tune=native
FAIL
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=yes,df
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> E.g.
> gcc -v -mtune=native -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
SkyLake
cc -v -mtune=native -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
/usr/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> What does your -mtune=native expand to?
How I can see it?
> Can you reproduce also without say --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none?
Yes, I'll rebuild witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r269158 PASS
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r268977 bootstrap PASS
r269340 FAIL
Fedora 29 / x86_64
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
