https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63612
--- Comment #5 from Dietmar Schindler ---
(In reply to steveren from comment #3)
> Is there any public discussion of the rationale behind this design decision?
In news:comp.std.c there is a thread "#pragma are considered statements" -
https://gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #2 from Dietmar Schindler ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> #pragma are considered statements.
This can't be entirely true, since #pragma can be used where statements cannot
(outside of functions), and #pragma STDC ce
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dietmar.schind...@manroland-web.com
Created attachment 33530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33530&action=edit
preprocessed file
The following command generates wrong code, returning 1 instead of 0 (as
