http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
Deji Akingunola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.5.1
--- Comment #3 from Deji Akinguno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
Summary: Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in
both host and internal subroutines
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 15:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If you compile the code in comment #1 with '-fbounds-check', you get:
>
> At line 32 of file pr39894.f90
> Fortran runtime error: Array bound mismatch, size misma
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 12:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=17692)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17692&action=view)
Test program
gfortran work fine if I change the line;
'listgeonm(1,:) = geonm(:,1)'
to
'li
t: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39894
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 12:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=17691)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17691&action=view)
invalid program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39893
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39893
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-02-27 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=17371)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17371&action=view)
Fortran file that produce the ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39318
mponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39318
--- Comment #17 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-31 04:27 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> ---
>
> From comment 1:
>
> Adw_xabcd_8(1:n) = transfer(-1,1.0) ! Adw_xabcd_8 is REAL
>
> That makes sense: One assigns N
--- Comment #2 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-31 03:31 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> call seg_sub(ip, sig, 1)
>
> Is that last argument a literal constant, name 'one'?
> Or is it the letter 'ell'?
>
It is a literal constant '
l
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37974
--- Comment #11 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-28 17:07 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: gfortran error and ICE at automatic type conversion with
> transfer
> intrinsic
>
> > When I run
> >
> > program test
> >
--- Comment #9 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-28 15:47 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > What does ... print?
>
> NaN on both ppc/intel-Darwin9.
>
> > My patch simply fixes the ICE in gfortran.
>
> I think the conversion of NaN to int is buggy since
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-27 22:31 ---
A simpler code (without cray pointers) as shown below also produces the errors.
...
subroutine adw_set(G_nk)
implicit none
integer G_nk
real*8 Adw_zbc_8(G_nk)
integer Adw_fn_I(G_nk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37930
--- Comment #5 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-04-17 13:21 ---
Yes adding compiling with -ffixed-line-length-80 solved the issue for me,
thanks to you both. I've noticed the original author of that code used tabs in
a couple of space he should have used spaces, the other comp
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-04-16 23:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13374)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13374&action=view)
testcase (cut and paste from original)
I can provide the whole file if necessary
--
http://gcc.
)
--
Summary: gfortran failed to compiled a 'valid' code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_akin
--- Comment #4 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-02-21 15:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
>
> > By the way, NAG f95 detects the interface/procedure mismatch also for the
> > original program as the inter
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-02-21 06:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=13081)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13081&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30902
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30902
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-28 22:07 ---
I'm sorry, it seems I'd posted the .cpp of a different code other than the one
that ICEd(signal.cc). However, the .cpp of signal.cc doesn't ICE for me too. In
any case I've done as you requested and
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-28 07:26 ---
The pre-processed is too big to attach, I've put it on
ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/datalist.cpp
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30316
error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-
ssa-ccp.c:434
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30316
--- Comment #8 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-21 03:52 ---
I've applied the fix to 4.2 branch, built and tested it, and it works fine. I
guess the bug can be closed now. Thanks all.
--
deji_aking at yahoo dot ca changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #7 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-17 21:10 ---
Thanks Rogers and Steve for the resolution of this bug. I hope you'll not
forget to commit it to the gcc-4.2 branch.
PS: I've applied the patch cleanly to the 4.2 branch but have not got the
opportunity to
n gfc_dep_resolver
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30207
--- Comment #5 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-05-06 16:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> Which is faster? Multiplying and dividing by a literal constant
> directly in your code or a function call to do the trivial work.
>
Really, I don't know enough about co
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-05-06 06:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In fact it is easy to divide by 90° and multiply by pi.
>
You just proved my point, one would want to divide by 180 and multiply by pi
;).
Having sind and co safeguard against such
t org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27452
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-03-15 04:45 ---
I'm re-opening this as my work-around doesn't work. I'll appreciate it if
someone could look at this issue. As mentioned earlier pgf90 and ifort compiles
the (attached) source file fine.
--
deji_aki
--- Comment #2 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2005-12-30 04:50 ---
While I now have a better understanding of this code, and can work around this
particular bug; all reduced testcases I'have been coming up with seems to work,
and the original (attached) code doesn't. So I
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2005-12-12 05:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=10454)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10454&action=view)
Code that produces above error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25358
ponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25358
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 20:55
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > I should add that I noticed the problem with gcc 4.0.0 (20041211) on FC3
>
> That still does not give enough information. What target is this, x86?
Yes. I thought I
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 20:06
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This works for me on ppc-darwin with gcc 4.0.0 (20041214).
I should add that I noticed the problem with gcc 4.0.0 (20041211) on FC3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 19:30
---
Created an attachment (id=7744)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7744&action=view)
FFT code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18998
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet
39 matches
Mail list logo
