https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322
--- Comment #5 from David Blaikie ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > We produce an abstract copy for use by repeated inline copies.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
--- Comment #6 from David Blaikie ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #4)
>
> I don't remember filing this bug. At the time maybe I thought it
> would be worthwhile to have "end to end" .debug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109114
Bug ID: 109114
Summary: lambdas should be non-pod for ABI
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107741
--- Comment #2 from David Blaikie ---
Ping on this? Would love it if someone could check my work/confirm my
diagnosis, even if it's not a priority to fix the bug immediately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107741
--- Comment #1 from David Blaikie ---
Oh, some context - discovered while investigating a related clang bug:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58819 - so don't check clang for an
example of what's right here, it has different bugs, tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107741
Bug ID: 107741
Summary: Missed member variable name in mangling of externally
visible lambdas used in inline initialization of
static members
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
--- Comment #26 from David Blaikie ---
FWIW I'm not sure it's a pragma I'd want, but it might be sufficient (put the
pragma at the start of very long/autogenerated files) - I'd have thought what
some folks (myself/LLVM included, I think) is a ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60833
--- Comment #3 from David Blaikie ---
FWIW, bug on the GDB side seems to have been fixed (
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16841 ) - might be nice to fix
the GCC side too. (though, admittedly, I don't know that this extra debug in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
15 matches
Mail list logo