https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108683
--- Comment #2 from David Ledger ---
Bar stores an int, it isn't empty.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108683
Bug ID: 108683
Summary: Move Occurs when initializing an aggregate base
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #20 from David Ledger ---
Yeah, your right. I had noticed the mistake and reduced the code without
thinking enough:
```CPP
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
struct overaligned { alignas(128) char padding[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #16 from David Ledger ---
The above example produces the xmm instruction on a clearly misaligned value.
I was searching the assembly using:
```SH
#!/bin/bash
g++-11 main.cpp -std=c++2a -O3 -march=native -S
grep -E "vmovdqu\s%xmm0,\
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #12 from David Ledger ---
(In reply to David Ledger from comment #11)
> This did not occur with GCC 10.2, it started in GCC 10.3:
>
> 10.3 (https://godbolt.org/z/jrdv31M17):
> ```
> 0x15d1ed3 A
> 0x15d1ed2 ~A
> 0x15d1ed3 ~A
> ```
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #11 from David Ledger ---
This did not occur with GCC 10.2, it started in GCC 10.3:
10.3 (https://godbolt.org/z/jrdv31M17):
```
0x15d1ed3 A
0x15d1ed2 ~A
0x15d1ed3 ~A
```
10.2 (https://godbolt.org/z/rrvKh9h6K):
```
0x2322ed1 A
0x2322
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
--- Comment #4 from David Ledger ---
Yeah, I'm just saying I suspect the problem was still there with the empty
capture list, its just not observable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
--- Comment #4 from David Ledger ---
It still seems like a bug though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100772
--- Comment #1 from David Ledger ---
Bump, is there anything else I need to provide to assist in this matter?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100772
Bug ID: 100772
Summary: Templated coroutine new function's arguments have
incorrect value categories/overload selection
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #6 from David Ledger ---
Is this the right place for me to track this bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
--- Comment #4 from David Ledger ---
@Iain Sandoe
In terms of the standard do you think this is technically undefined behaviour?
I tried bring this up with Std-Proposals but got no response at all.
I believe either I'm very bad at writing (likel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97433
Bug ID: 97433
Summary: C++20 Coroutines, Unexpected reordering of
await_resume, return_value and yield_value
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
19 matches
Mail list logo
