https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117465
Bug ID: 117465
Summary: Disable -Wnonnull-compare in macros
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108593
Bug ID: 108593
Summary: No inlining after function cloning
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7061
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
--- Comment #8 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
So this works in Clang now
int foo(int x, int y) { // any compiler will happily inline this function
return x / y;
}
int test(int x, int y) {
int r = 0;
[[clang::noinline]] r += foo(x, y); //
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
--- Comment #5 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
So you prefer eg.
g = a[i] - [[gnu::always_inline]] foo(x, y) + 2 * bar();
over
g = a[i] - __builtin_always_inline(foo(x, y)) + 2 * bar();
?
What is your proposed syntax?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
Bug ID: 104187
Summary: Call site specific attribute to control inliner
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93150
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103002
Bug ID: 103002
Summary: Missed loop unrolling opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102564
Bug ID: 102564
Summary: Missed loop vectorization with reduction and ptr
load/store inside loop
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102483
Bug ID: 102483
Summary: Regression in codegen of reduction of 4 chars
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100260
Bug ID: 100260
Summary: DSE: join stores
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99971
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98713
--- Comment #5 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
User knows the data better, so he/she may prefer abs with branch.
Also PGO may say that branch for abs is better based on profile data.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98713
Bug ID: 98713
Summary: Failure to generate branch version of abs if user
requested it
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98663
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98658
--- Comment #3 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Yes, runtime check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98658
--- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
ICC produces memcpy:
https://godbolt.org/z/oKxxTM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98658
Bug ID: 98658
Summary: Loop idiom recognization for memcpy/memmove
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
19 matches
Mail list logo
