[Bug libfortran/120196] New: In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

2025-05-09 Thread daniil2472s at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 Bug ID: 120196 Summary: In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed. Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

2025-05-09 Thread daniil2472s at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #5 from Daniil Kochergin --- Done. Thank you!

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

2025-05-09 Thread daniil2472s at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #3 from Daniil Kochergin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 61380 [details] > gcc16-pr120191-test.patch > > Perhaps like this? Sorry for the trivial question, but should I mail the patch along with

[Bug fortran/120191] New: Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

2025-05-09 Thread daniil2472s at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 Bug ID: 120191 Summary: Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED S