[Bug c++/119848] Concept check makes it impossible to return types that depend on the type being defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119848 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/118722] accepted undefined static integral data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118722 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug libstdc++/116549] std::disable_sized_sentinel_for is missing specialisation for std::move_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug libstdc++/113470] Should std::tuple_size be a complete type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113470 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- I think the essence is how [tuple.helper] p4 is specified. Combining with [tuple.syn], template struct tuple_size; // not defined template struct tuple_size; I tend to read that a definition is required f

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Michael Levine from comment #2) > (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) > > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > > > It seems wrong that libstdc++ needs to include for > > > ranges::iot

[Bug c++/112099] GCC doesn't recognize matching friend operator!= to resolve ambiguity in operator==

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112099 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/110853] New: [c++-concepts] Bad interaction between deduction guide with decay and constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853 Bug ID: 110853 Summary: [c++-concepts] Bad interaction between deduction guide with decay and constraints Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/95825] [10/11/12/13 Regression] boost::optional -Wuninitialized with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95825 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to daniel.klauer from comment #7) > Reduced test case: > > > template > struct tc_optional_base > { > // default ctor leaves m_storage uninitialized > tc_optional_base() : m_initializ

[Bug libstdc++/71899] An internal BooleanTestable trait should be provided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71899 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > LWG 2743 seems to be the wrong issue, I think https://wg21.link/lwg2114 is > the right one. Ah yes, this was an unintended mislinking on my side. Feel free to