--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-08-11
00:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=9466)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9466&action=view)
Source code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322
: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danalis at cis dot udel dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-08-10
01:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=9457)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9457&action=view)
Source code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23305
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danalis at cis dot udel dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23305
--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-08-04
19:16 ---
For the record the reduced test case was derived from h07.cpp of bench++
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22563
--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-07-19
19:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=9307)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9307&action=view)
reduced test
Is it bitchy to complain about few nanoseconds slowdown (per iteration) :)
--
o: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danalis at cis dot udel dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22563
--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-06-30
22:24 ---
I meant to say "return(*ap1)" not "return(return *ap1)"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863
--- Additional Comments From danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-06-30
22:16 ---
I'm looking at the reduced testcase from comment #6,
and I noticed that f() is declared double, but does not return anything.
Thus the code doesn't compile with -O3 -Wall -Werror.
If I fix the bu
