https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107836
--- Comment #3 from Zixuan Chen ---
I think there is a data dependency between the second asm statement and the
third, a read-after-write one. If the third one is moved to the top then we
can't get the correct value of mm5(mm0). Also, could you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107836
Bug ID: 107836
Summary: x86_64 inline functions -O2/-O3 optimization error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
