[Bug target/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

2016-03-08 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #5 from Cyril Bur --- Hi Martin, (After forgetting -O2 and wondering why everything changed: conclusion -O2 is important for this) I added -fno-inline (so: -O2 -Wall -Wextra -flto -fno-inline) to my cases and while optimisations may

[Bug c/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

2016-02-28 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #2 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 37820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37820&action=edit with -flto

[Bug c/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

2016-02-28 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #1 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 37819 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37819&action=edit without -flto

[Bug c/70010] New: powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

2016-02-28 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
iority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cyrilbur at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37818 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37818&action=edit C code to reproduce $ powerpc64-buildroot-linux-gnu-gcc

[Bug c/69969] [5.3.0 Regression] Function attribute no-vsx

2016-02-25 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69969 --- Comment #1 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 37798 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37798&action=edit minimal test case in c

[Bug c/69969] New: [5.3.0 Regression] Function attribute no-vsx

2016-02-25 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cyrilbur at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37797 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37797&action=edit preprocessed file $ powerpc64-buildroot-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using b

[Bug c/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

2015-02-17 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 --- Comment #1 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 34796 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34796&action=edit Preprocessed version of the simple test case

[Bug c/65096] New: Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

2015-02-17 Thread cyrilbur at gmail dot com
Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cyrilbur at gmail dot com Created attachment 34795 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34795&action=edit Simple test case When a heap allocated packed struct is passed by value and the struct cont