--- Comment #9 from corinl at gmx dot de 2009-02-12 21:53 ---
I do not really understand problem 5 for the case when the only dependancy for
the code-path check is a local variable. In this case the value cannot be
change by any other code than existing between the two checks, so this
--- Comment #4 from corinl at gmx dot de 2009-02-12 07:37 ---
here's the copy from the precompiled header file (.ii), may be it helps:
(check_permissions_local removed, it was just for test..same error as before)
uid_t fs_perms_uid_orig; gid_t fs_perms_gid_orig; if (check_permis
--- Comment #3 from corinl at gmx dot de 2009-02-12 07:26 ---
Thanks for the info. Unluckily I just found the bug reported first now for
sure:
Code:
// setuid/setgid only affect the current thread
#define FS_PERMS_SET(_uid, _gid) \
bool check_permissions_local
--- Comment #1 from corinl at gmx dot de 2009-02-08 22:07 ---
Oh sorry, I just see that "buf" could be used uninitialized for sure (if
xl==NULL). but well, shouldn't this warning then be issued all the times? so
the bug is now reversed -> "missing warning&quo
unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: corinl at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: 4.2.3-2ubuntu7
GCC host triplet: x86_64
GCC target triplet: x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39133
