[Bug libstdc++/116399] C++26 text_encoding​::​aliases_view is not default-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116399 --- Comment #16 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com --- Requiring size or common would force internal representation strategies. With the current set of requirements, you could, for example, store all the names in a giant array or string and

[Bug c++/113798] [C++26] P2662R3 - Pack indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113798 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug libstdc++/116399] C++26 text_encoding​::​aliases_view is not default-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116399 --- Comment #3 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com --- Yes, libstdc++ is correct. Not sure what one would do with a default constructed alias aliases_view

[Bug c++/99599] [12/13 Regression] Concepts requirement falsely reporting cyclic dependency, breaks tag_invoke pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c++/115964] GCC accepts invalid program with explicit object member function overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115964 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c/79459] Please add enable_if and diagnose_if attributes (from clang)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79459 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c++/102609] [C++23] P0847R7 - Deducing this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c++/110348] [C++26] P2741R3 - User-generated static_assert messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348 --- Comment #16 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Now implemented for GCC 14. Thanks for working on this > As I wrote already in the PR, in addition to looking through the paper &

[Bug c++/110348] [C++26] P2741R3 - User-generated static_assert messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c++/110535] New: Internal error when performing a surrogate call with unsatisfied constraints

: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: corentinjabot at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Consider int f1(int); template struct A { using F = int(int); operator F*() requires N { return f1

[Bug libstdc++/105291] include/c++/12.0.1/debug/safe_unordered_container.h:71:28: error: captured variable '__local_end' cannot appear here

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105291 corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corentinjabot at gmail

[Bug c/56523] -Wunitialized is described to be enabled by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523 --- Comment #2 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com 2013-03-04 17:33:26 UTC --- Actually after a few more test it works correctly but the statement "This enables some extra warning flags that are not enabled by -Wall." is confusing

[Bug c/56523] New: -Wunitialized is described to be enabled -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523 Bug #: 56523 Summary: -Wunitialized is described to be enabled -Wall Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal