http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Schlegl 2011-06-05
15:54:32 UTC ---
> Oh it is done so that people can unwind as the frame pointer is omitted. Try
> with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info .
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-info doesn´
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Schlegl 2011-06-05
13:49:07 UTC ---
> on x86_64 you want -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info. Eh-frame is mandated by the
> PS-ABI.
Yeah, but I´m compiling for i586, so x86_32!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
Summary: eh_frame section created although using
-fno-exceptions and fno-rtti
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
--- Comment #5 from codemasterhs at yahoo dot de 2009-11-21 09:02 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The pointer is not declared volatile.
>
> static struct smpMsg_t * volatile freeList;
>
> would be a volatile pointer.
>
Ok, this worked. So where has to be the volatil
--- Comment #3 from codemasterhs at yahoo dot de 2009-11-20 22:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Neither freeList nor serviceMsg are volatile. Thus freeList can never change
> and serviceMsg = msg is a dead assignment.
>
But they are, or is my syntax wrong?
static volati
--- Comment #1 from codemasterhs at yahoo dot de 2009-11-20 22:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=19070)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19070&action=view)
the out from gcc with -v -save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42126
word!?
--
Summary: gcc optimizes line away/optimizes to an endless loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
Rep
--- Comment #2 from codemasterhs at yahoo dot de 2009-04-03 08:30 ---
Subject: Re: wrong assumption of clobbered registers of inline
assembly
The code is for my loader/os and so I can´t and do not want to use the
builtin functions.
Your 1st example works, but I find it a bit
: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: codemasterhs at yahoo dot de
GCC host triplet: cygwin
GCC target triplet: i586 elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39620
quot;(*help),"r"((uint8t)(1 << *posBit)));
if(*posBit == 7) {
*posBit= 0;
(*posByte)++;
} else {
(*posBit)++;
}
return res;
}
--
Summary: inline assembly generates wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: codemasterhs at yahoo dot de
GCC host triplet: cygwin
GCC target triplet: i586-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36514
10 matches
Mail list logo
