https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Gunnerson ---
Regarding the ENOENT fix above, it should no longer be necessary to call
synlink_status() in fs::remove(). All cases are already handled without that
check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Gunnerson ---
Thanks for the quick fix!
tatus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chillermillerlong at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The current std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all() implementation see
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chillermillerlong at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
libstdc++'s std::experimental::filesystem::remove() function currently seems to
b